Nuprl Lemma : baire2cantor2baire

∀a:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. (init0(a) ⇒ increasing-sequence(a) ⇒ (cantor2baire(baire2cantor(a)) = a ∈ (ℕ ⟶ ℕ)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  init0: init0(a),  cantor2baire: cantor2baire(a),  baire2cantor: baire2cantor(a),  increasing-sequence: increasing-sequence(a),  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  increasing-sequence: increasing-sequence(a),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  label: ...$L... t,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  baire2cantor: baire2cantor(a),  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bfalse: ff,  guard: {T},  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  init0: init0(a),  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  cantor2baire-aux: cantor2baire-aux(a;n),  cantor2baire: cantor2baire(a),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  not: ¬A,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  uimplies: b supposing a,  ge: i ≥ j ,  false: False,  nat: ℕ,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  nat-pred-as-sub,  iff_weakening_equal,  ifthenelse_wf,  true_wf,  squash_wf,  add_nat_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  btrue_wf,  bfalse_wf,  nat-pred_wf,  subtract-add-cancel,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases_sqequal,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_wf,  eq_int_wf,  primrec-unroll,  le_wf,  false_wf,  primrec0_lemma,  init0_wf,  increasing-sequence_wf,  nat_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  less_than_wf,  ge_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  nat_properties
Rules used in proof :  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality,  imageElimination,  addEquality,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  promote_hyp,  applyLambdaEquality,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalityElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  levelHypothesis,  addLevel,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  functionEquality,  applyEquality,  unionElimination,  axiomEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  computeAll,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalRule,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  intWeakElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  functionExtensionality,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}a:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  (init0(a)  {}\mRightarrow{}  increasing-sequence(a)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (cantor2baire(baire2cantor(a))  =  a))



Date html generated: 2017_04_21-AM-11_22_42
Last ObjectModification: 2017_04_20-PM-03_57_46

Theory : continuity


Home Index