Nuprl Lemma : weak-continuity-implies-strong-cantor

∀F:(ℕ ⟶ 𝔹) ⟶ ℕ
  ∃M:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ 𝔹) ⟶ (ℕ?)
   ∀f:ℕ ⟶ 𝔹. ((∃n:ℕ. ((M n f) = (inl (F f)) ∈ (ℕ?))) ∧ (∀n:ℕ. (M n f) = (inl (F f)) ∈ (ℕ?) supposing ↑isl(M n f)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  isl: isl(x),  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  unit: Unit,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  inl: inl x,  union: left + right,  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  exposed-it: exposed-it,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  bfalse: ff,  prop: ℙ,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s],  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  ext2Cantor: ext2Cantor(n;f;d),  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  isl: isl(x)
Lemmas referenced :  strong-continuity2-implies-uniform-continuity2-nat,  nat_wf,  bool_wf,  le_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_le_int,  ext2Cantor_wf,  int_seg_wf,  btrue_wf,  unit_wf2,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  le_wf,  all_wf,  exists_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  isect_wf,  assert_wf,  isl_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  lt_int_wf,  assert_of_lt_int,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_properties,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  functionEquality,  hypothesis,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  isectElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_isectElimination,  inlEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  natural_numberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  inrEquality,  axiomEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  productEquality,  unionEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  isect_memberFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}F:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}
    \mexists{}M:n:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}?)
      \mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}
          ((\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  ((M  n  f)  =  (inl  (F  f))))  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (M  n  f)  =  (inl  (F  f))  supposing  \muparrow{}isl(M  n  f)))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-10_00_05
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_53_14

Theory : continuity


Home Index