Nuprl Lemma : intlex-aux-antisym

∀[l1:ℤ List]. ∀[l2:{as:ℤ List| ||as|| = ||l1|| ∈ ℤ} ].
  (l1 = l2 ∈ (ℤ List)) supposing (intlex-aux(l2;l1) = tt and intlex-aux(l1;l2) = tt)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  intlex-aux: intlex-aux(l1;l2),  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  btrue: tt,  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  so_apply: x[s],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  cons: [a / b],  top: Top,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  guard: {T},  subtract: n - m,  ge: i ≥ j ,  le: A ≤ B,  not: ¬A,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  false: False,  sq_type: SQType(T),  nat: ℕ,  intlex-aux: intlex-aux(l1;l2),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  decidable: Dec(P),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  isl: isl(x),  bool: 𝔹,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  list_induction,  uall_wf,  list_wf,  equal-wf-base,  isect_wf,  bool_wf,  list_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  list-cases,  length_of_nil_lemma,  nil_wf,  product_subtype_list,  length_of_cons_lemma,  le_weakening2,  length_wf,  non_neg_length,  length_wf_nat,  nat_wf,  subtype_rel-equal,  base_wf,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  equal_wf,  set_subtype_base,  set_wf,  add-associates,  subtract_wf,  minus-zero,  add-swap,  subtype_base_sq,  add-mul-special,  two-mul,  mul-distributes-right,  zero-mul,  one-mul,  nat_properties,  spread_cons_lemma,  decidable__lt,  top_wf,  less_than_wf,  less_than_transitivity2,  less_than_irreflexivity,  less_than_transitivity1,  le_weakening,  bfalse_wf,  and_wf,  isl_wf,  unit_wf2,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  decidable__equal_int,  false_wf,  not-equal-2,  not-lt-2,  cons_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  le-add-cancel2
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  thin,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  setEquality,  intEquality,  hypothesis,  lambdaFormation,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_pairFormation,  sqequalIntensionalEquality,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  minusEquality,  axiomEquality,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  multiplyEquality,  lessCases,  sqequalAxiom,  independent_pairFormation,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[l1:\mBbbZ{}  List].  \mforall{}[l2:\{as:\mBbbZ{}  List|  ||as||  =  ||l1||\}  ].
    (l1  =  l2)  supposing  (intlex-aux(l2;l1)  =  tt  and  intlex-aux(l1;l2)  =  tt)



Date html generated: 2017_09_29-PM-05_48_46
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-01_37_15

Theory : list_0


Home Index