Nuprl Lemma : intlex-total

∀as,bs:ℤ List.  ((↑as ≤_lex bs) ∨ (↑bs ≤_lex as))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  intlex: l1 ≤_lex l2,  list: T List,  assert: ↑b,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  intlex: l1 ≤_lex l2,  has-value: (a)↓,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  or: P ∨ Q,  true: True,  prop: ℙ,  band: p ∧b q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  bor: p ∨bq,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  intlex-aux: intlex-aux(l1;l2),  nil: [],  cons: [a / b],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  exposed-it: exposed-it,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  decidable: Dec(P),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  subtract: n - m
Lemmas referenced :  value-type-has-value,  nat_wf,  set-value-type,  le_wf,  int-value-type,  length_wf_nat,  lt_int_wf,  length_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  testxxx_lemma,  assert_wf,  bor_wf,  eq_int_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  intlex-aux_wf,  equal-wf-base,  list_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  less_than_wf,  list_wf,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  not-equal-2,  not-lt-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  le-add-cancel,  list_induction,  all_wf,  or_wf,  nil_wf,  list-cases,  length_of_nil_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  cons_wf,  product_subtype_list,  spread_cons_lemma,  top_wf,  less_than_transitivity2,  le_weakening2,  less_than_irreflexivity,  less_than_transitivity1,  le_weakening,  unit_wf2,  decidable__equal_int,  false_wf,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  condition-implies-le,  add-associates,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  minus-one-mul-top,  zero-add,  le-add-cancel2
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalRule,  callbyvalueReduce,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  independent_isectElimination,  intEquality,  lambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  inlFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  inrFormation,  addEquality,  functionEquality,  rename,  hypothesis_subsumption,  lessCases,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  independent_pairFormation,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  inrEquality,  axiomEquality,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}as,bs:\mBbbZ{}  List.    ((\muparrow{}as  \mleq{}\_lex  bs)  \mvee{}  (\muparrow{}bs  \mleq{}\_lex  as))



Date html generated: 2017_09_29-PM-05_49_38
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-01_37_50

Theory : list_0


Home Index