Nuprl Lemma : imax-list-append2

∀[as,bs:ℤ List].  (imax-list(as @ bs) = imax(imax-list(as);imax-list(bs)) ∈ ℤ) supposing (0 < ||bs|| and 0 < ||as||)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  imax-list: imax-list(L),  length: ||as||,  append: as @ bs,  list: T List,  imax: imax(a;b),  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  append: as @ bs,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  and: P ∧ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  true: True,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  imax-list: imax-list(L),  combine-list: combine-list(x,y.f[x; y];L),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  cons: [a / b],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uiff: uiff(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  list_induction,  uall_wf,  list_wf,  isect_wf,  less_than_wf,  length_wf,  equal-wf-base,  list_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  length_of_nil_lemma,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  decidable__lt,  append_wf,  length-append,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  imax-list_wf,  equal_wf,  imax_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  imax_assoc,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  imax-list-cons,  list-cases,  reduce_hd_cons_lemma,  reduce_tl_cons_lemma,  list_accum_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  list_accum_cons_lemma,  add_nat_plus,  length_wf_nat,  nat_plus_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  add-is-int-iff,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  false_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  thin,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  intEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  lambdaFormation,  rename,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  setElimination,  pointwiseFunctionality

Latex:
\mforall{}[as,bs:\mBbbZ{}  List].
    (imax-list(as  @  bs)  =  imax(imax-list(as);imax-list(bs)))  supposing  (0  <  ||bs||  and  0  <  ||as||)



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-07_39_49
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_13_02

Theory : list_1


Home Index