Nuprl Lemma : insert-by-sorted-by

∀[T:Type]
  ∀eq,r:T ⟶ T ⟶ 𝔹.
    Linorder(T;a,b.↑(r a b))
    ⇒ (∀x:T. ∀L:T List.  (sorted-by(λx,y. (↑(r x y));L) ⇒ sorted-by(λx,y. (↑(r x y));insert-by(eq;r;x;L)))) 
    supposing ∀a,b:T.  (↑(eq a b) ⇐⇒ a = b ∈ T)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  insert-by: insert-by(eq;r;x;l),  sorted-by: sorted-by(R;L),  list: T List,  linorder: Linorder(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  insert-by: insert-by(eq;r;x;l),  sorted-by: sorted-by(R;L),  select: L[n],  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  top: Top,  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  cand: A c∧ B,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  assert: ↑b,  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  linorder: Linorder(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  order: Order(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  trans: Trans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  connex: Connex(T;x,y.R[x; y])
Lemmas referenced :  assert_wf,  assert_witness,  equal_wf,  list_induction,  sorted-by_wf,  l_member_wf,  insert-by_wf,  list_wf,  linorder_wf,  all_wf,  iff_wf,  bool_wf,  length_of_nil_lemma,  stuck-spread,  base_wf,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  int_seg_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  select_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  int_seg_wf,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  equal-wf-T-base,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  sorted-by-cons,  eqtt_to_assert,  uiff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  l_all_cons,  length_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  decidable__lt,  l_all_iff,  member-insert-by
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  axiomEquality,  hypothesis,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  functionEquality,  setElimination,  setEquality,  universeEquality,  baseClosed,  independent_isectElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  imageElimination,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}eq,r:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}.
        Linorder(T;a,b.\muparrow{}(r  a  b))
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}x:T.  \mforall{}L:T  List.
                    (sorted-by(\mlambda{}x,y.  (\muparrow{}(r  x  y));L)  {}\mRightarrow{}  sorted-by(\mlambda{}x,y.  (\muparrow{}(r  x  y));insert-by(eq;r;x;L)))) 
        supposing  \mforall{}a,b:T.    (\muparrow{}(eq  a  b)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  a  =  b)



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-08_32_00
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_52_30

Theory : list_1


Home Index