Nuprl Lemma : unshuffle-iseg

∀[T:Type]. ∀as,bs:T List.  (as ≤ bs ⇒ unshuffle(as) ≤ unshuffle(bs))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  unshuffle: unshuffle(L),  iseg: l1 ≤ l2,  list: T List,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  product: x:A × B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  unshuffle: unshuffle(L),  lt_int: i <z j,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  cons: [a / b],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  assert: ↑b,  bfalse: ff,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  cand: A c∧ B
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_seg_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_subtype,  false_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  le_wf,  length_wf,  non_neg_length,  nat_properties,  decidable__lt,  lelt_wf,  less_than_wf,  iseg_wf,  all_wf,  list_wf,  unshuffle_wf,  set_wf,  primrec-wf2,  nat_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  length_wf_nat,  list-cases,  length_of_nil_lemma,  reduce_tl_nil_lemma,  nil_iseg,  product_subtype_list,  iseg_nil,  cons_wf,  null_cons_lemma,  cons_iseg,  length_of_cons_lemma,  reduce_hd_cons_lemma,  reduce_tl_cons_lemma,  lt_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  iseg_weakening,  nil_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  because_Cache,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  unionElimination,  addLevel,  applyEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  levelHypothesis,  hypothesis_subsumption,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  cumulativity,  imageElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  functionEquality,  productEquality,  addEquality,  universeEquality,  promote_hyp,  equalityElimination,  instantiate,  independent_pairEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}as,bs:T  List.    (as  \mleq{}  bs  {}\mRightarrow{}  unshuffle(as)  \mleq{}  unshuffle(bs))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-08_58_11
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_13_25

Theory : list_1


Home Index