Nuprl Lemma : rel-is-immediate

∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].
  (∀x,y:T.  (R x y ⇐⇒ R+! x y)) supposing 
     ((∀a,b,c:T.  (((R a b) ∧ (R a c)) ⇒ (b = c ∈ T))) and 
     (∀x,y:T.  ((R+ x y) ⇒ (¬(R+ y x)))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rel-immediate: R!,  rel_plus: R+,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rel-immediate: R!,  cand: A c∧ B,  infix_ap: x f y,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  rel_plus: R+,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  decidable: Dec(P),  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  rel_exp: R^n,  eq_int: (i =z j),  subtract: n - m,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  btrue: tt,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  le: A ≤ B
Lemmas referenced :  rel_plus_wf,  rel-immediate_wf,  all_wf,  equal_wf,  not_wf,  rel-rel-plus,  rel_plus_iff2,  rel_star_wf,  rel-star-iff-rel-plus-or,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  eq_int_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  equal-wf-base,  bool_cases,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  less_than_wf,  rel_exp_one,  rel_exp_wf,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  subtract_wf,  decidable__lt,  false_wf,  not-lt-2,  not-equal-2,  less-iff-le,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-associates,  add-zero,  add-commutes,  zero-add,  le-add-cancel,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  add-swap,  minus-zero,  le-add-cancel2,  minus-minus,  minus-one-mul,  minus-one-mul-top
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  cut,  introduction,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  voidElimination,  applyEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  functionExtensionality,  hypothesis,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  rename,  axiomEquality,  productEquality,  because_Cache,  lambdaFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  independent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  hyp_replacement,  Error :applyLambdaEquality,  unionElimination,  setElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  instantiate,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  baseClosed,  impliesFunctionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  addEquality,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    (\mforall{}x,y:T.    (R  x  y  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  R\msupplus{}!  x  y))  supposing 
          ((\mforall{}a,b,c:T.    (((R  a  b)  \mwedge{}  (R  a  c))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (b  =  c)))  and 
          (\mforall{}x,y:T.    ((R\msupplus{}  x  y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}(R\msupplus{}  y  x)))))



Date html generated: 2016_10_25-AM-11_01_19
Last ObjectModification: 2016_07_12-AM-07_08_22

Theory : general


Home Index