Nuprl Lemma : not_mem_remove1

∀s:DSet. ∀a:|s|. ∀bs:|s| List.  ((¬↑(a ∈b bs)) ⇒ ((bs \ a) = bs ∈ (|s| List)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  remove1: as \ a,  mem: a ∈b as,  list: T List,  assert: ↑b,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  equal: s = t ∈ T,  dset: DSet,  set_car: |p|
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  or: P ∨ Q,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  cons: [a / b],  dset: DSet,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  colength: colength(L),  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  guard: {T},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  decidable: Dec(P),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  infix_ap: x f y,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bor: p ∨bq
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  list-cases,  mem_nil_lemma,  remove1_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  colength-cons-not-zero,  colength_wf_list,  set_car_wf,  istype-false,  le_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  subtype_base_sq,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  spread_cons_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__le,  mem_cons_lemma,  remove1_cons_lemma,  nat_wf,  not_wf,  assert_wf,  mem_wf,  list_wf,  dset_wf,  nil_wf,  false_wf,  set_eq_wf,  uiff_transitivity,  equal-wf-T-base,  bool_wf,  equal_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_dset_eq,  testxxx_lemma,  true_wf,  iff_transitivity,  bnot_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  cons_wf,  squash_wf,  istype-universe
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  axiomEquality,  functionIsTypeImplies,  inhabitedIsType,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productElimination,  equalityIsType1,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  instantiate,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  equalityIsType4,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  intEquality,  equalityElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}s:DSet.  \mforall{}a:|s|.  \mforall{}bs:|s|  List.    ((\mneg{}\muparrow{}(a  \mmember{}\msubb{}  bs))  {}\mRightarrow{}  ((bs  \mbackslash{}  a)  =  bs))



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-PM-01_03_48
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_08-AM-11_14_45

Theory : list_2


Home Index