Nuprl Lemma : proj-sep-implies

∀n:ℕ. ∀a,b:ℙ^n.  (a ≠ b ⇒ (∃i,j:ℕn + 1. (a i) * (b j) ≠ (a j) * (b i)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  proj-sep: a ≠ b,  real-proj: ℙ^n,  rneq: x ≠ y,  rmul: a * b,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  apply: f a,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  real-proj: ℙ^n,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  proj-sep: a ≠ b,  real-vec-sep: a ≠ b,  rless: x < y,  sq_exists: ∃x:{A| B[x]},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  real: ℝ,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  rneq: x ≠ y,  guard: {T},  real-vec: ℝ^n,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  punit: u(a),  real-vec-mul: a*X,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rdiv: (x/y),  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2
Lemmas referenced :  Cauchy-Schwarz-strict,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  Cauchy-Schwarz-non-equality,  proj-norm-positive,  real-vec-sep-iff-rneq,  sq_stable__less_than,  int-to-real_wf,  real_wf,  real-vec-dist_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  punit_wf,  real-vec-mul_wf,  rdiv_wf,  real-vec-norm_wf,  rless_wf,  rneq_wf,  int_seg_properties,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  real-vec_wf,  rminus_wf,  rneq-symmetry,  rmul_wf,  exists_wf,  int_seg_wf,  proj-sep_wf,  real-proj_wf,  nat_wf,  rmul_preserves_rneq,  rinv_wf2,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  rmul-one,  rneq_functionality,  req_transitivity,  rmul_functionality,  req_weakening,  rmul-rinv,  real_polynomial_null,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_mul_lemma,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  itermMinus_wf,  real_term_value_minus_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  isectElimination,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  minusEquality,  inrFormation,  promote_hyp,  addLevel,  levelHypothesis

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}a,b:\mBbbP{}\^{}n.    (a  \mneq{}  b  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mexists{}i,j:\mBbbN{}n  +  1.  (a  i)  *  (b  j)  \mneq{}  (a  j)  *  (b  i)))



Date html generated: 2017_10_05-AM-00_19_14
Last ObjectModification: 2017_06_20-PM-02_13_35

Theory : inner!product!spaces


Home Index