Nuprl Lemma : rneq-if-rabs

∀x,y:ℝ.  x ≠ y supposing r0 < |x - y|


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rneq: x ≠ y,  rless: x < y,  rabs: |x|,  rsub: x - y,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  rless: x < y,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  int-to-real: r(n),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  top: Top,  real: ℝ,  has-value: (a)↓,  rsub: x - y,  rmax: rmax(x;y),  rminus: -(x),  true: True,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  rneq: x ≠ y,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  absval: |i|,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j 
Lemmas referenced :  rlessw_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rabs_wf,  rsub_wf,  rless_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  istype-less_than,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  real_wf,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  rabs-as-rmax,  rminus_wf,  imax_strict_ub,  mul_nat_plus,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  istype-top,  less_than_wf,  add-is-int-iff,  minus-is-int-iff,  itermMinus_wf,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  false_wf,  radd-approx,  div_rem_sum,  nequal_wf,  rem_bounds_absval,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_wf,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  absval_unfold2,  absval_wf,  nat_properties,  multiply-is-int-iff,  intformle_wf,  intformor_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_or_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  cut,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesis,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  hypothesisEquality,  universeIsType,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality_alt,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  inhabitedIsType,  unionElimination,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  equalityIsType1,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  callbyvalueReduce,  intEquality,  multiplyEquality,  divideEquality,  addEquality,  minusEquality,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  equalityIsType4,  baseClosed,  lessCases,  axiomSqEquality,  isectIsTypeImplies,  imageMemberEquality,  inlEquality_alt,  inrEquality_alt,  applyLambdaEquality,  closedConclusion,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  unionIsType,  remainderEquality,  equalityElimination,  inlFormation_alt,  inrFormation_alt,  functionIsType

Latex:
\mforall{}x,y:\mBbbR{}.    x  \mneq{}  y  supposing  r0  <  |x  -  y|



Date html generated: 2019_10_29-AM-09_39_21
Last ObjectModification: 2018_11_11-PM-11_11_25

Theory : reals


Home Index