Nuprl Lemma : enum-fin-seq-true

∀m:ℕ. ((λx.tt) = enum-fin-seq(m)[0] ∈ (ℕ ⟶ 𝔹))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  enum-fin-seq: enum-fin-seq(m),  select: L[n],  nat: ℕ,  btrue: tt,  bool: 𝔹,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  enum-fin-seq: enum-fin-seq(m),  select: L[n],  cons: [a / b],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  squash: ↓T,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  list_n: A List(n),  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  less_than: a < b
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  primrec0_lemma,  btrue_wf,  nat_wf,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  primrec-unroll,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  select_append_front,  map_wf,  primrec_wf,  list_wf,  le_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  append_wf,  bfalse_wf,  int_seg_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  length-map,  enum-fin-seq_wf,  list_n_wf,  exp_wf2,  false_wf,  list_n_properties,  exp-positive-stronger,  lelt_wf,  length_wf,  select-map,  subtype_rel_list,  top_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  because_Cache,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  functionEquality,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  int_eqReduceFalseSq

Latex:
\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}.  ((\mlambda{}x.tt)  =  enum-fin-seq(m)[0])



Date html generated: 2017_04_20-AM-07_22_41
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_59_09

Theory : continuity


Home Index