Nuprl Lemma : monotone-bar-induction8-2
∀Q:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℙ
((∀n:ℕ. ∀s:ℕn ⟶ ℕ. ((∀m:ℕ. Q[n + 1;s.m@n]) ⇒ Q[n;s])) ⇒ (∀f:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ⇃(∃n:ℕ. ∀m:{n...}. Q[m;f])) ⇒ ⇃(Q[0;λx.⊥]))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],
seq-add: s.x@n,
int_upper: {i...},
int_seg: {i..j-},
nat: ℕ,
bottom: ⊥,
prop: ℙ,
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
exists: ∃x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
true: True,
lambda: λx.A[x],
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
add: n + m,
natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
member: t ∈ T,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
nat: ℕ,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
uimplies: b supposing a,
sq_stable: SqStable(P),
squash: ↓T,
int_upper: {i...},
le: A ≤ B,
and: P ∧ Q,
less_than': less_than'(a;b),
false: False,
not: ¬A,
so_apply: x[s],
prop: ℙ,
int_seg: {i..j-},
lelt: i ≤ j < k,
guard: {T},
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),
exists: ∃x:A. B[x],
top: Top,
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],
ge: i ≥ j ,
decidable: Dec(P),
or: P ∨ Q,
ext2Baire: ext2Baire(n;f;d),
bool: 𝔹,
unit: Unit,
it: ⋅,
btrue: tt,
uiff: uiff(P;Q),
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,
bfalse: ff,
sq_type: SQType(T),
bnot: ¬bb,
assert: ↑b,
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
true: True,
cand: A c∧ B,
outl: outl(x),
isl: isl(x)
Lemmas referenced :
strong-continuity-rel,
all_wf,
int_upper_wf,
nat_wf,
upper_subtype_nat,
sq_stable__le,
subtype_rel_function,
int_seg_wf,
int_seg_subtype_nat,
istype-false,
subtype_rel_self,
implies-quotient-true,
exists_wf,
unit_wf2,
equal-wf-T-base,
subtype_rel_union,
set_subtype_base,
lelt_wf,
istype-int,
int_subtype_base,
assert_wf,
isl_wf,
le_wf,
int_seg_properties,
full-omega-unsat,
intformand_wf,
intformless_wf,
itermVar_wf,
itermConstant_wf,
intformle_wf,
int_formula_prop_and_lemma,
istype-void,
int_formula_prop_less_lemma,
int_term_value_var_lemma,
int_term_value_constant_lemma,
int_formula_prop_le_lemma,
int_formula_prop_wf,
quotient_wf,
true_wf,
equiv_rel_true,
nat_properties,
decidable__equal_int,
intformnot_wf,
intformeq_wf,
itermAdd_wf,
int_formula_prop_not_lemma,
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,
int_term_value_add_lemma,
decidable__le,
seq-add_wf,
basic_bar_induction,
decidable__assert,
seq-adjoin_wf,
ext2Baire_wf,
squash_wf,
bool_wf,
lt_int_wf,
eqtt_to_assert,
assert_of_lt_int,
eqff_to_assert,
bool_cases_sqequal,
subtype_base_sq,
bool_subtype_base,
assert-bnot,
iff_weakening_uiff,
less_than_wf,
iff_imp_equal_bool,
btrue_wf,
bfalse_wf,
btrue_neq_bfalse,
decidable__lt,
equal-wf-base-T,
seq-adjoin-is-seq-add,
iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
Error :lambdaFormation_alt,
rename,
cut,
introduction,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
dependent_functionElimination,
thin,
Error :lambdaEquality_alt,
isectElimination,
setElimination,
because_Cache,
hypothesis,
sqequalRule,
applyEquality,
functionExtensionality,
hypothesisEquality,
independent_isectElimination,
natural_numberEquality,
independent_functionElimination,
imageMemberEquality,
baseClosed,
imageElimination,
independent_pairFormation,
Error :universeIsType,
Error :functionIsType,
Error :inhabitedIsType,
functionEquality,
unionEquality,
productEquality,
productElimination,
baseApply,
closedConclusion,
intEquality,
Error :unionIsType,
Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,
approximateComputation,
Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,
int_eqEquality,
Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,
voidElimination,
Error :productIsType,
Error :equalityIsType3,
instantiate,
universeEquality,
addEquality,
unionElimination,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
hyp_replacement,
Error :functionExtensionality_alt,
equalityElimination,
Error :equalityIsType2,
promote_hyp,
cumulativity,
Error :equalityIsType1,
applyLambdaEquality,
Error :equalityIsType4,
Error :inrEquality_alt
Latex:
\mforall{}Q:n:\mBbbN{} {}\mrightarrow{} (\mBbbN{}n {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbN{}) {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbP{}
((\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}. \mforall{}s:\mBbbN{}n {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbN{}. ((\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}. Q[n + 1;s.m@n]) {}\mRightarrow{} Q[n;s]))
{}\mRightarrow{} (\mforall{}f:\mBbbN{} {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbN{}. \00D9(\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}. \mforall{}m:\{n...\}. Q[m;f]))
{}\mRightarrow{} \00D9(Q[0;\mlambda{}x.\mbot{}]))
Date html generated:
2019_06_20-PM-02_56_49
Last ObjectModification:
2018_10_04-PM-11_40_03
Theory : continuity
Home
Index