Nuprl Lemma : efficient-exp

∀i:ℤ. ∀n:ℕ.  (∃j:ℤ [(j = i^n ∈ ℤ)])


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  exp: i^n,  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  and: P ∧ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  false: False,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A,  ge: i ≥ j ,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  prop: ℙ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  nat: ℕ,  guard: {T},  implies: P ⇒ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  uimplies: b supposing a,  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  rem_bounds_1,  exp_mul,  iff_weakening_equal,  exp2,  div_rem_sum,  remainder_wfa,  add-is-int-iff,  itermAdd_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  false_wf,  exp_wf2,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  mul_bounds_1a,  divide_wf,  exp_add,  remainder_wf,  decidable__le,  nequal_wf,  divide_wfa,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformle_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformand_wf,  istype-le,  div_mono1,  istype-less_than,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformnot_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__lt,  nat_properties,  div_bounds_1,  istype-void,  exp0_lemma,  istype-int,  subtype_rel_self,  subtype_rel_function,  nat_wf,  le_wf,  equal-wf-base,  sq_exists_wf,  natrec_wf,  istype-nat,  lelt_wf,  set_subtype_base,  int_seg_wf,  exp1,  decidable__equal_int,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  int-value-type,  equal_wf,  set-value-type
Rules used in proof :  addEquality,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  productElimination,  hyp_replacement,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  multiplyEquality,  Error :productIsType,  imageMemberEquality,  int_eqEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  approximateComputation,  voidElimination,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  functionEquality,  functionExtensionality,  Error :setIsType,  Error :functionIsType,  sqequalBase,  baseClosed,  closedConclusion,  baseApply,  applyEquality,  Error :dependent_set_memberFormation_alt,  unionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  rename,  setElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  Error :universeIsType,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  sqequalRule,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  Error :equalityIstype,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  introduction,  cutEval,  hypothesisEquality,  intEquality,  cut,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}i:\mBbbZ{}.  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.    (\mexists{}j:\mBbbZ{}  [(j  =  i\^{}n)])



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_31_24
Last ObjectModification: 2019_06_19-PM-02_36_13

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index