Nuprl Lemma : sum_wf

[n:ℕ]. ∀[f:ℕn ⟶ ℤ].  (f[x] x < n) ∈ ℤ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  sum: Σ(f[x] x < k) int_seg: {i..j-} nat: uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] member: t ∈ T function: x:A ⟶ B[x] natural_number: $n int:
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T sum: Σ(f[x] x < k) nat: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] uimplies: supposing a ge: i ≥  all: x:A. B[x] decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False implies:  Q not: ¬A top: Top and: P ∧ Q prop:
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf int_formula_prop_wf int_term_value_var_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_and_lemma itermVar_wf itermConstant_wf intformle_wf intformnot_wf intformand_wf satisfiable-full-omega-tt decidable__le nat_properties int_seg_wf sum_aux_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut sqequalRule lemma_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin natural_numberEquality because_Cache setElimination rename hypothesisEquality hypothesis lambdaEquality applyEquality independent_isectElimination dependent_functionElimination unionElimination dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality intEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll axiomEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry functionEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].    (\mSigma{}(f[x]  |  x  <  n)  \mmember{}  \mBbbZ{})



Date html generated: 2016_05_14-AM-07_31_17
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_14-PM-09_56_52

Theory : int_2


Home Index