Nuprl Lemma : satisfies-integer-problem-length

∀[eqs,ineqs:ℤ List List]. ∀[xs:ℤ List].
  {(∀e∈eqs.||e|| = ||xs|| ∈ ℤ) ∧ (∀e∈ineqs.||e|| = ||xs|| ∈ ℤ)} supposing satisfies-integer-problem(eqs;ineqs;xs)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  satisfies-integer-problem: satisfies-integer-problem(eqs;ineqs;xs),  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  guard: {T},  and: P ∧ Q,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  guard: {T},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  and: P ∧ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  satisfies-integer-problem: satisfies-integer-problem(eqs;ineqs;xs),  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  satisfies-integer-equality: xs ⋅ as =0,  satisfies-integer-inequality: xs ⋅ as ≥0,  prop: ℙ
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_wf,  length_wf,  list_wf,  satisfies-integer-problem_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  lambdaFormation,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  lemma_by_obid,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  intEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  independent_pairEquality,  lambdaEquality,  axiomEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  because_Cache,  equalityTransitivity

Latex:
\mforall{}[eqs,ineqs:\mBbbZ{}  List  List].  \mforall{}[xs:\mBbbZ{}  List].
    \{(\mforall{}e\mmember{}eqs.||e||  =  ||xs||)  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}e\mmember{}ineqs.||e||  =  ||xs||)\} 
    supposing  satisfies-integer-problem(eqs;ineqs;xs)



Date html generated: 2016_05_14-AM-07_11_55
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_26-PM-01_06_42

Theory : omega


Home Index