Nuprl Lemma : function-eq-transitivity
∀[A:Type]. ∀[B:Base].
∀[f,g,h:Base]. (function-eq(A;a.B[a];f;g) ⇒ function-eq(A;a.B[a];g;h) ⇒ function-eq(A;a.B[a];f;h))
supposing base-type-family{i:l}(A;a.B[a])
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
function-eq: function-eq(A;a.B[a];f;g),
base-type-family: base-type-family{i:l}(A;a.B[a]),
uimplies: b supposing a,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
so_apply: x[s],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
base: Base,
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
uimplies: b supposing a,
implies: P ⇒ Q,
function-eq: function-eq(A;a.B[a];f;g),
prop: ℙ,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
label: ...$L... t,
so_apply: x[s],
guard: {T},
and: P ∧ Q,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
Lemmas referenced :
equal-wf-base,
function-eq_wf,
base_wf,
base-type-family_wf,
base-type-family-implies,
and_wf,
equal_wf,
equal-wf-T-base
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
isect_memberFormation,
introduction,
cut,
lambdaFormation,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
hypothesis,
extract_by_obid,
isectElimination,
thin,
hypothesisEquality,
sqequalRule,
isect_memberEquality,
axiomEquality,
because_Cache,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
cumulativity,
baseApply,
closedConclusion,
baseClosed,
independent_isectElimination,
lambdaEquality,
dependent_functionElimination,
universeEquality,
dependent_set_memberEquality,
independent_pairFormation,
hyp_replacement,
Error :applyLambdaEquality,
applyEquality,
setElimination,
rename,
productElimination,
setEquality,
productEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type]. \mforall{}[B:Base].
\mforall{}[f,g,h:Base].
(function-eq(A;a.B[a];f;g) {}\mRightarrow{} function-eq(A;a.B[a];g;h) {}\mRightarrow{} function-eq(A;a.B[a];f;h))
supposing base-type-family\{i:l\}(A;a.B[a])
Date html generated:
2016_10_21-AM-09_39_31
Last ObjectModification:
2016_07_12-AM-05_01_29
Theory : per!type
Home
Index