Nuprl Lemma : equal-functions-by-Taylor

F,G:ℕ ⟶ ℝ ⟶ ℝ.
  ((∀k:ℕ. ∀x,y:ℝ.  ((x y)  (F[k;x] F[k;y])))
   (∀k:ℕ. ∀x,y:ℝ.  ((x y)  (G[k;x] G[k;y])))
   infinite-deriv-seq((-∞, ∞);i,x.F[i;x])
   infinite-deriv-seq((-∞, ∞);i,x.G[i;x])
   (∀m:ℕ. ∃c:ℝ. ∃N:ℕ. ∀k:{N...}. ∀x:{x:ℝ|x| ≤ r(m)} .  (|F[k;x]| ≤ c))
   (∀m:ℕ. ∃c:ℝ. ∃N:ℕ. ∀k:{N...}. ∀x:{x:ℝ|x| ≤ r(m)} .  (|G[k;x]| ≤ c))
   (∀n:ℕ(F[n;r0] G[n;r0]))
   (∀x:ℝ(F[0;x] G[0;x])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  infinite-deriv-seq: infinite-deriv-seq(I;i,x.F[i; x]) riiint: (-∞, ∞) rleq: x ≤ y rabs: |x| req: y int-to-real: r(n) real: int_upper: {i...} nat: so_apply: x[s1;s2] all: x:A. B[x] exists: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q set: {x:A| B[x]}  function: x:A ⟶ B[x] natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q so_lambda: λ2y.t[x; y] member: t ∈ T so_apply: x[s1;s2] prop: uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] nat: subtype_rel: A ⊆B label: ...$L... t rfun: I ⟶ℝ uimplies: supposing a le: A ≤ B and: P ∧ Q less_than': less_than'(a;b) false: False not: ¬A nat_plus: + rneq: x ≠ y guard: {T} or: P ∨ Q iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q int_seg: {i..j-} ge: i ≥  lelt: i ≤ j < k decidable: Dec(P) satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] top: Top true: True pointwise-req: x[k] y[k] for k ∈ [n,m] uiff: uiff(P;Q) rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  Taylor-series-bounded-converges-everywhere nat_wf real_wf all_wf req_wf int-to-real_wf exists_wf int_upper_wf rleq_wf rabs_wf int_upper_subtype_nat infinite-deriv-seq_wf riiint_wf i-member_wf fun-converges-to-pointwise rsum_wf rmul_wf rdiv_wf int_seg_subtype_nat false_wf fact_wf nat_plus_wf rless-int int_seg_properties nat_properties decidable__lt le_wf nat_plus_properties satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformless_wf itermConstant_wf itermVar_wf intformnot_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_wf rless_wf rnexp_wf int_seg_wf member_riiint_lemma req_weakening converges-to_functionality rsum_functionality req_functionality rmul_functionality rdiv_functionality unique-limit
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity lambdaFormation cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution dependent_functionElimination thin sqequalRule lambdaEquality applyEquality functionExtensionality hypothesisEquality hypothesis independent_functionElimination isectElimination natural_numberEquality because_Cache setElimination rename setEquality functionEquality addEquality independent_isectElimination independent_pairFormation inrFormation productElimination dependent_set_memberEquality unionElimination equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry Error :applyLambdaEquality,  voidElimination dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality intEquality isect_memberEquality voidEquality computeAll

Latex:
\mforall{}F,G:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}.
    ((\mforall{}k:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}x,y:\mBbbR{}.    ((x  =  y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (F[k;x]  =  F[k;y])))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}k:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}x,y:\mBbbR{}.    ((x  =  y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (G[k;x]  =  G[k;y])))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  infinite-deriv-seq((-\minfty{},  \minfty{});i,x.F[i;x])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  infinite-deriv-seq((-\minfty{},  \minfty{});i,x.G[i;x])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}c:\mBbbR{}.  \mexists{}N:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}k:\{N...\}.  \mforall{}x:\{x:\mBbbR{}|  |x|  \mleq{}  r(m)\}  .    (|F[k;x]|  \mleq{}  c))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}c:\mBbbR{}.  \mexists{}N:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}k:\{N...\}.  \mforall{}x:\{x:\mBbbR{}|  |x|  \mleq{}  r(m)\}  .    (|G[k;x]|  \mleq{}  c))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (F[n;r0]  =  G[n;r0]))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}x:\mBbbR{}.  (F[0;x]  =  G[0;x])))



Date html generated: 2016_10_26-AM-11_52_07
Last ObjectModification: 2016_09_05-AM-10_28_06

Theory : reals


Home Index