Nuprl Lemma : Taylor-series-bounded-converges-everywhere

F:ℕ ⟶ ℝ ⟶ ℝ
  ((∀k:ℕ. ∀x,y:ℝ.  ((x y)  (F[k;x] F[k;y])))
   infinite-deriv-seq((-∞, ∞);i,x.F[i;x])
   (∀m:ℕ. ∃c:ℝ. ∃N:ℕ. ∀k:{N...}. ∀x:{x:ℝ|x| ≤ r(m)} .  (|F[k;x]| ≤ c))
   lim k→∞{(F[i;r0]/r((i)!)) x^i 0≤i≤k} = λx.F[0;x] for x ∈ (-∞, ∞))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  infinite-deriv-seq: infinite-deriv-seq(I;i,x.F[i; x]) fun-converges-to: lim n→∞.f[n; x] = λy.g[y] for x ∈ I riiint: (-∞, ∞) rsum: Σ{x[k] n≤k≤m} rdiv: (x/y) rleq: x ≤ y rabs: |x| rnexp: x^k1 req: y rmul: b int-to-real: r(n) real: int_upper: {i...} nat: so_apply: x[s1;s2] all: x:A. B[x] exists: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q set: {x:A| B[x]}  function: x:A ⟶ B[x] natural_number: $n fact: (n)!
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] member: t ∈ T implies:  Q prop: uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] nat: so_apply: x[s1;s2] subtype_rel: A ⊆B so_lambda: λ2y.t[x; y] label: ...$L... t rfun: I ⟶ℝ fun-converges-to: lim n→∞.f[n; x] = λy.g[y] for x ∈ I i-approx: i-approx(I;n) riiint: (-∞, ∞) top: Top nat_plus: + uimplies: supposing a exists: x:A. B[x] and: P ∧ Q cand: c∧ B int_upper: {i...} sq_stable: SqStable(P) squash: T ge: i ≥  decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) false: False not: ¬A guard: {T} iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q less_than: a < b less_than': less_than'(a;b) true: True uiff: uiff(P;Q) rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q) itermConstant: "const" req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2 le: A ≤ B rge: x ≥ y sq_exists: x:{A| B[x]} rless: x < y rneq: x ≠ y real: rnonneg: rnonneg(x) rleq: x ≤ y subtract: m converges-to: lim n→∞.x[n] y rsub: y rdiv: (x/y)
Lemmas referenced :  Taylor-series-around-zero-converges-everywhere set_wf real_wf rleq_wf int-to-real_wf all_wf nat_wf exists_wf int_upper_wf rabs_wf int_upper_subtype_nat infinite-deriv-seq_wf riiint_wf i-member_wf req_wf member_rccint_lemma subtype_rel_set nat_plus_wf icompact_wf rccint_wf nat_plus_subtype_nat radd_wf nat_properties nat_plus_properties sq_stable__icompact decidable__le satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformnot_wf intformle_wf itermVar_wf int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_wf le_wf zero-rleq-rabs rleq_transitivity rless_wf rleq_weakening_equal rleq-int intformand_wf itermConstant_wf intformless_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma rless-int radd-preserves-rleq rminus_wf rleq_functionality real_term_polynomial itermSubtract_wf itermAdd_wf itermMinus_wf real_term_value_const_lemma real_term_value_sub_lemma real_term_value_add_lemma real_term_value_minus_lemma real_term_value_var_lemma req-iff-rsub-is-0 false_wf rabs-of-nonneg req_weakening rless_functionality_wrt_implies radd_functionality_wrt_rleq rless_functionality rleq_functionality_wrt_implies rleq_weakening_rless equal_wf rmul_wf rmul-is-positive decidable__lt rmul-rdiv-cancel2 rmul-zero-both rmul_preserves_rless rdiv_wf small-reciprocal-real rdiv-factorial-limit-zero fact-non-zero rneq-int fact_wf int_term_value_add_lemma sq_stable__less_than int_upper_properties rnexp_wf rsub_wf less_than'_wf less_than_wf le-add-cancel add-zero add-associates add_functionality_wrt_le add-commutes minus-one-mul-top zero-add minus-one-mul minus-add condition-implies-le not-lt-2 radd-zero-both radd_comm rminus-zero radd_functionality req_functionality uiff_transitivity rabs_functionality rabs-rdiv rleq_weakening rless_transitivity1 req_inversion rmul_preserves_rleq rabs-rabs rnexp_functionality req_transitivity rabs-rnexp rmul_preserves_rleq2 rinv_wf2 itermMultiply_wf real_term_value_mul_lemma rmul_functionality rinv-as-rdiv rinv-of-rmul rmul-rinv rmul-int-rdiv2 rmul_preserves_req rabs-rmul rmul-rinv3 rneq_wf iff_weakening_equal squash_wf true_wf imax_wf imax_nat_plus intformeq_wf int_formula_prop_eq_lemma imax_ub rabs-rleq-iff rminus-int int_upper_subtype_int_upper rmul-identity1 rmul_functionality_wrt_rleq2
Rules used in proof :  cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity lambdaFormation hypothesis sqequalHypSubstitution dependent_functionElimination thin hypothesisEquality independent_functionElimination isectElimination sqequalRule lambdaEquality natural_numberEquality because_Cache setElimination rename setEquality applyEquality functionExtensionality functionEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality minusEquality independent_isectElimination productElimination dependent_pairFormation dependent_set_memberEquality imageMemberEquality baseClosed imageElimination unionElimination int_eqEquality intEquality computeAll independent_pairFormation productEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry inlFormation addLevel inrFormation axiomEquality applyLambdaEquality independent_pairEquality addEquality isect_memberFormation multiplyEquality universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}F:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}
    ((\mforall{}k:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}x,y:\mBbbR{}.    ((x  =  y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (F[k;x]  =  F[k;y])))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  infinite-deriv-seq((-\minfty{},  \minfty{});i,x.F[i;x])
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}m:\mBbbN{}.  \mexists{}c:\mBbbR{}.  \mexists{}N:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}k:\{N...\}.  \mforall{}x:\{x:\mBbbR{}|  |x|  \mleq{}  r(m)\}  .    (|F[k;x]|  \mleq{}  c))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  lim  k\mrightarrow{}\minfty{}.\mSigma{}\{(F[i;r0]/r((i)!))  *  x\^{}i  |  0\mleq{}i\mleq{}k\}  =  \mlambda{}x.F[0;x]  for  x  \mmember{}  (-\minfty{},  \minfty{}))



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-PM-00_43_08
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-08_46_53

Theory : reals


Home Index