Nuprl Lemma : ratexp_wf

∀[a:ℤ × ℕ+]. ∀[n:ℕ].  (ratexp(a;n) ∈ {r:ℤ × ℕ+| ratreal(r) = ratreal(a)^n} )


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  ratexp: ratexp(x;n),  ratreal: ratreal(r),  rnexp: x^k1,  req: x = y,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  product: x:A × B[x],  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  ratexp: ratexp(x;n),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  has-value: (a)↓,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rneq: x ≠ y,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  istype-less_than,  rnexp_zero_lemma,  decidable__lt,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  req_wf,  ratreal_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_subtype_base,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  subtract_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  rnexp_wf,  decidable__le,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  istype-le,  set-value-type,  product-value-type,  istype-nat,  rdiv_wf,  rless-int,  rless_wf,  req-int-fractions2,  subtype_base_sq,  nequal_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  req_functionality,  ratreal-req,  req_weakening,  ratmul_wf,  rmul_wf,  req_transitivity,  rmul_functionality,  rmul_comm,  req_inversion,  rnexp_step
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionIsTypeImplies,  inhabitedIsType,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  independent_pairEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityIstype,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  callbyvalueReduce,  setEquality,  productEquality,  intEquality,  isectIsTypeImplies,  productIsType,  closedConclusion,  inrFormation_alt,  productElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  instantiate,  cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}[a:\mBbbZ{}  \mtimes{}  \mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].    (ratexp(a;n)  \mmember{}  \{r:\mBbbZ{}  \mtimes{}  \mBbbN{}\msupplus{}|  ratreal(r)  =  ratreal(a)\^{}n\}  )



Date html generated: 2019_10_30-AM-09_30_09
Last ObjectModification: 2019_01_11-PM-05_13_56

Theory : reals


Home Index