Nuprl Lemma : rsum_linearity-rsub

∀[n,m:ℤ]. ∀[x,y:{n..m + 1-} ⟶ ℝ].  (Σ{x[k] - y[k] | n≤k≤m} = (Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m} - Σ{y[k] | n≤k≤m}))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rsum: Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m},  rsub: x - y,  req: x = y,  real: ℝ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  rsum: Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  has-value: (a)↓,  has-valueall: has-valueall(a),  rsub: x - y,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  cand: A c∧ B,  top: Top,  nat: ℕ,  guard: {T},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced :  req_witness,  rsum_wf,  rsub_wf,  int_seg_wf,  real_wf,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  from-upto_wf,  list_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  valueall-type-has-valueall,  list-valueall-type,  real-valueall-type,  map_wf,  evalall-reduce,  valueall-type-real-list,  equal_wf,  radd-list_wf-bag,  radd_wf,  rminus_wf,  list-subtype-bag,  subtype_rel_self,  rmul_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  req_weakening,  req_functionality,  radd-list-linearity1,  radd_functionality,  rminus-as-rmul,  req_inversion,  radd-list-linearity2,  radd-list_functionality,  map-length,  length_wf_nat,  nat_wf,  length_wf,  length-map,  subtype_rel_list,  top_wf,  select-map,  req_wf,  select_wf,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  uiff_transitivity
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesis,  independent_functionElimination,  functionEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  because_Cache,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  setEquality,  productEquality,  lambdaFormation,  callbyvalueReduce,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_functionElimination,  minusEquality,  productElimination,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  independent_pairFormation,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[n,m:\mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[x,y:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}].    (\mSigma{}\{x[k]  -  y[k]  |  n\mleq{}k\mleq{}m\}  =  (\mSigma{}\{x[k]  |  n\mleq{}k\mleq{}m\}  -  \mSigma{}\{y[k]  |  n\mleq{}k\mleq{}m\}))



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-08_59_32
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-07_39_00

Theory : reals


Home Index