Nuprl Lemma : square-nonneg

∀[x:ℝ]. (r0 ≤ (x * x))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rleq: x ≤ y,  rmul: a * b,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  top: Top,  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2,  itermConstant: "const",  uimplies: b supposing a,  rnonneg2: rnonneg2(x),  reg-seq-mul: reg-seq-mul(x;y),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  real: ℝ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  and: P ∧ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  rnonneg: rnonneg(x),  rleq: x ≤ y,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  ge: i ≥ j ,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  guard: {T},  int_upper: {i...},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  true: True,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  rmul-bdd-diff-reg-seq-mul,  rnonneg2_functionality,  req_weakening,  rmul-identity1,  rmul_functionality,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  real_term_value_mul_lemma,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  real_term_polynomial,  req_transitivity,  rnonneg_functionality,  reg-seq-mul_wf,  rnonneg-iff,  nat_plus_wf,  real_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rmul_wf,  rsub_wf,  less_than'_wf,  less_than_wf,  int_upper_wf,  all_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_transitivity1,  int_upper_properties,  nat_plus_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  equal_wf,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  square_non_neg,  mul_nat_plus,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  le_functionality,  le_weakening,  multiply_functionality_wrt_le,  div_bounds_1
Rules used in proof :  voidEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaFormation,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  axiomEquality,  minusEquality,  rename,  setElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesis,  applyEquality,  isectElimination,  extract_by_obid,  voidElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  productElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  dependent_functionElimination,  lambdaEquality,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  cut,  introduction,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  unionElimination,  divideEquality,  multiplyEquality,  lemma_by_obid,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[x:\mBbbR{}].  (r0  \mleq{}  (x  *  x))



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-08_29_24
Last ObjectModification: 2017_08_02-PM-00_31_37

Theory : reals


Home Index