Nuprl Lemma : stump-monotone

∀T:Type. ∀t:wfd-tree(T). ∀n:ℕ. ∀s:ℕn ⟶ T.  ((¬↑(stump(t) n s)) ⇒ (∀x:T. (¬↑(stump(t) (n + 1) s++x))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  stump: stump(t),  wfd-tree: wfd-tree(T),  seq-adjoin: s++t,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  false: False,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  subtract: n - m,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  so_apply: x[s],  stump: stump(t),  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  int_upper: {i...},  seq-adjoin: s++t,  seq-append: seq-append(n;m;s1;s2),  less_than: a < b
Lemmas referenced :  wfd-tree-induction,  all_wf,  nat_wf,  int_seg_wf,  not_wf,  assert_wf,  stump_wf,  decidable__le,  false_wf,  not-le-2,  sq_stable__le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-associates,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  le_wf,  seq-adjoin_wf,  wfd-tree_wf,  wfd_tree_rec_leaf_lemma,  wfd_tree_rec_node_lemma,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  decidable__lt,  not-lt-2,  not-equal-2,  lelt_wf,  subtract_wf,  minus-minus,  add-member-int_seg2,  le-add-cancel2,  int_upper_subtype_nat,  nat_properties,  nequal-le-implies,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  top_wf,  less_than_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  minus-zero,  less-iff-le,  less_than_transitivity1,  le_weakening,  less_than_irreflexivity,  bnot_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  bool_cases,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  squash_wf,  true_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  hypothesis,  functionEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  voidElimination,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  intEquality,  minusEquality,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  hypothesis_subsumption,  universeEquality,  lessCases,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  impliesFunctionality,  hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mforall{}T:Type.  \mforall{}t:wfd-tree(T).  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}s:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  T.
    ((\mneg{}\muparrow{}(stump(t)  n  s))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}x:T.  (\mneg{}\muparrow{}(stump(t)  (n  +  1)  s++x))))



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-07_45_21
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-03_17_23

Theory : co-recursion


Home Index