Nuprl Lemma : cantor2baire2cantor

∀a:ℕ ⟶ 𝔹. (initF(a) ⇒ (baire2cantor(cantor2baire(a)) = a ∈ (ℕ ⟶ 𝔹)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  initF: initF(a),  cantor2baire: cantor2baire(a),  baire2cantor: baire2cantor(a),  nat: ℕ,  bool: 𝔹,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  bnot: ¬bb,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  ge: i ≥ j ,  initF: initF(a),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  bfalse: ff,  assert: ↑b,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  top: Top,  cantor2baire-aux: cantor2baire-aux(a;n),  nat-pred: n-1,  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  and: P ∧ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  nat: ℕ,  member: t ∈ T,  cantor2baire: cantor2baire(a),  baire2cantor: baire2cantor(a),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  btrue_wf,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  nat-pred_wf,  cantor2baire-aux_wf,  eq_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  equal-wf-base,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformle_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__lt,  nat_properties,  cantor2baire-aux-pos,  assert_wf,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  assert_elim,  bfalse_wf,  iff_imp_equal_bool,  primrec0_lemma,  int_subtype_base,  set_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  initF_wf,  nat_wf,  le_wf,  false_wf,  decidable__equal_nat
Rules used in proof :  promote_hyp,  addEquality,  productElimination,  equalityElimination,  baseClosed,  computeAll,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  rename,  setElimination,  levelHypothesis,  because_Cache,  addLevel,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  lambdaEquality,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  functionEquality,  applyEquality,  unionElimination,  isectElimination,  hypothesis,  independent_pairFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  dependent_functionElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  sqequalRule,  functionExtensionality,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}a:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}.  (initF(a)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (baire2cantor(cantor2baire(a))  =  a))



Date html generated: 2017_04_21-AM-11_22_34
Last ObjectModification: 2017_04_20-PM-03_53_37

Theory : continuity


Home Index