Nuprl Lemma : make-strict-agrees

∀[alpha:ℕ ⟶ ℕ]. ∀[n:ℕ].  ∀[i:ℕn]. ((make-strict(alpha) i) = (alpha i) ∈ ℤ) supposing strictly-increasing-seq(n;alpha)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  make-strict: make-strict(alpha),  strictly-increasing-seq: strictly-increasing-seq(n;s),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  strictly-increasing-seq: strictly-increasing-seq(n;s),  make-strict: make-strict(alpha),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  strict-inc: StrictInc,  squash: ↓T,  true: True
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_wf,  strictly-increasing-seq_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  nat_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  istype-false,  istype-nat,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  istype-less_than,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-le,  subtract-1-ge-0,  decidable__lt,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  subtract_wf,  primrec-unroll,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  less_than_wf,  subtract-add-cancel,  make-strict_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  thin,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  independent_functionElimination,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  Error :universeIsType,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  axiomEquality,  Error :isectIsTypeImplies,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  applyEquality,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  Error :functionIsType,  intWeakElimination,  approximateComputation,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  voidElimination,  Error :functionIsTypeImplies,  productElimination,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  unionElimination,  Error :productIsType,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  Error :equalityIstype,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[alpha:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].
    \mforall{}[i:\mBbbN{}n].  ((make-strict(alpha)  i)  =  (alpha  i))  supposing  strictly-increasing-seq(n;alpha)



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_57_20
Last ObjectModification: 2019_02_06-PM-03_51_03

Theory : continuity


Home Index