Nuprl Lemma : fset-ac-lub-is-lub-constrained

∀[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[P:fset(T) ⟶ 𝔹]. ∀[ac1,ac2:{ac:fset(fset(T))| 
                                                             (↑fset-antichain(eq;ac)) ∧ fset-all(ac;a.P[a])} ].
  least-upper-bound({ac:fset(fset(T))| (↑fset-antichain(eq;ac)) ∧ fset-all(ac;a.P[a])} ;ac1,ac2.fset-ac-le(eq;ac1;ac2);
                    ac1;ac2;fset-ac-lub(eq;ac1;ac2))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fset-ac-lub: fset-ac-lub(eq;ac1;ac2),  fset-ac-le: fset-ac-le(eq;ac1;ac2),  fset-antichain: fset-antichain(eq;ac),  fset-all: fset-all(s;x.P[x]),  fset: fset(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  least-upper-bound: least-upper-bound(T;x,y.R[x; y];a;b;c),  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  and: P ∧ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  least-upper-bound: least-upper-bound(T;x,y.R[x; y];a;b;c),  and: P ∧ Q,  fset-ac-lub: fset-ac-lub(eq;ac1;ac2),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  cand: A c∧ B,  squash: ↓T,  prop: ℙ,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  fset-ac-le: fset-ac-le(eq;ac1;ac2),  fset-all: fset-all(s;x.P[x]),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  not: ¬A,  or: P ∨ Q
Lemmas referenced :  member-fset-union,  member-fset-minimals,  empty-fset_wf,  equal_wf,  not_wf,  assert-fset-null,  iff_wf,  all_wf,  assert_of_bnot,  fset-member_wf,  isect_wf,  uall_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  fset-all-iff,  deq_wf,  bool_wf,  set_wf,  fset-all_wf,  fset-antichain_wf,  assert_wf,  and_wf,  subtype_rel_sets,  fset-ac-lub_wf,  deq-f-subset_wf,  bnot_wf,  fset-filter_wf,  fset-null_wf,  assert_witness,  fset-ac-le_wf,  fset-ac-le-implies,  iff_weakening_equal,  fset-union-commutes,  true_wf,  squash_wf,  f-subset_wf,  f-subset-union,  fset-ac-le_weakening_f-subset,  fset-minimals-ac-le,  f-proper-subset-dec_wf,  fset-minimals_wf,  deq-fset_wf,  fset_wf,  fset-union_wf,  fset-ac-le_transitivity
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  independent_pairFormation,  lemma_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  natural_numberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  universeEquality,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  lambdaFormation,  independent_pairEquality,  cumulativity,  setEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  functionEquality,  addLevel,  impliesFunctionality,  unionElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[P:fset(T)  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].  \mforall{}[ac1,ac2:\{ac:fset(fset(T))| 
                                                                                                                          (\muparrow{}fset-antichain(eq;ac))
                                                                                                                          \mwedge{}  fset-all(ac;a.P[a])\}  ].
    least-upper-bound(\{ac:fset(fset(T))|  (\muparrow{}fset-antichain(eq;ac))  \mwedge{}  fset-all(ac;a.P[a])\}  ;
                                        ac1,ac2.fset-ac-le(eq;ac1;ac2);ac1;ac2;fset-ac-lub(eq;ac1;ac2))



Date html generated: 2016_05_14-PM-03_48_59
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_14-PM-10_40_39

Theory : finite!sets


Home Index