Nuprl Lemma : implies-member-fset-minimals

∀[T:Type]
  ∀eq:EqDecider(T). ∀s:fset(fset(T)). ∀a:fset(T).
    (a ∈ s
    ⇒ (¬(∃z:fset(T). (z ∈ fset-minimals(x,y.f-proper-subset-dec(eq;x;y); s) ∧ z ⊆≠ a)))
    ⇒ a ∈ fset-minimals(x,y.f-proper-subset-dec(eq;x;y); s))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fset-minimals: fset-minimals(x,y.less[x; y]; s),  f-proper-subset-dec: f-proper-subset-dec(eq;xs;ys),  f-proper-subset: xs ⊆≠ ys,  deq-fset: deq-fset(eq),  fset-member: a ∈ s,  fset: fset(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  cand: A c∧ B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  fset-member_witness,  deq-fset_wf,  fset-minimals_wf,  fset_wf,  f-proper-subset-dec_wf,  not_wf,  exists_wf,  fset-member_wf,  f-proper-subset_wf,  fset-size_wf,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  nat_wf,  add_nat_wf,  false_wf,  le_wf,  add-is-int-iff,  itermAdd_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  equal_wf,  decidable__lt,  deq_wf,  member-fset-minimals,  fset-all-iff,  bnot_wf,  iff_transitivity,  assert_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  assert-f-proper-subset-dec,  assert_witness,  fset-size-proper-subset,  f-proper-subset_transitivity
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  cumulativity,  productEquality,  applyEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  productElimination,  universeEquality,  impliesFunctionality,  imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(T).  \mforall{}s:fset(fset(T)).  \mforall{}a:fset(T).
        (a  \mmember{}  s
        {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}(\mexists{}z:fset(T).  (z  \mmember{}  fset-minimals(x,y.f-proper-subset-dec(eq;x;y);  s)  \mwedge{}  z  \msubseteq{}\mneq{}  a)))
        {}\mRightarrow{}  a  \mmember{}  fset-minimals(x,y.f-proper-subset-dec(eq;x;y);  s))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-09_23_30
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_25_29

Theory : finite!sets


Home Index