Nuprl Lemma : split_rel_last

∀[A:Type]
  ∀r:A ⟶ A ⟶ 𝔹. ∀L:A List.
    (∃L1,L2:A List
      (((L = (L1 @ L2) ∈ (A List)) ∧ (¬↑null(L2)) ∧ (∀b∈L2.↑r[b;last(L)]))
      ∧ ¬↑r[last(L1);last(L)] supposing ¬↑null(L1))) supposing 
       ((¬↑null(L)) and 
       (∀a:A. (↑r[a;a])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  last: last(L),  null: null(as),  append: as @ bs,  list: T List,  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  and: P ∧ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  implies: P ⇒ Q,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  uimplies: b supposing a,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  true: True,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  cons: [a / b],  bfalse: ff,  guard: {T},  select: L[n],  subtract: n - m,  last: last(L),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  it: ⋅,  nil: [],  list_ind: list_ind,  append: as @ bs,  cand: A c∧ B,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  squash: ↓T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  sq_type: SQType(T)
Lemmas referenced :  bool_wf,  l_member_wf,  last_wf,  l_all_wf,  length-append,  length_wf,  append_wf,  equal_wf,  list_wf,  exists_wf,  null_wf,  not_wf,  assert_wf,  all_wf,  isect_wf,  list_induction,  null_nil_lemma,  assert_witness,  true_wf,  decidable__assert,  cons_wf,  product_subtype_list,  null_cons_lemma,  list-cases,  null_wf2,  not_assert_elim,  btrue_wf,  length_of_nil_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  l_all_single,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  bfalse_wf,  assert_elim,  nil_wf,  false_wf,  assert_of_null,  nat_wf,  length_wf_nat,  squash_wf,  last_cons,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  l_all_cons,  top_wf,  subtype_rel_list,  last_cons2,  and_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  equal-wf-T-base,  iff_functionality_wrt_iff,  iff_imp_equal_bool,  bool_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  list_ind_cons_lemma
Rules used in proof :  universeEquality,  universeIsType,  functionEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  isectEquality,  setEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  productEquality,  hypothesis,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  sqequalRule,  hypothesisEquality,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  thin,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  natural_numberEquality,  functionIsType,  inhabitedIsType,  unionElimination,  productElimination,  hypothesis_subsumption,  promote_hyp,  functionExtensionality,  cumulativity,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_pairFormation,  hyp_replacement,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type]
    \mforall{}r:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  A  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}.  \mforall{}L:A  List.
        (\mexists{}L1,L2:A  List
            (((L  =  (L1  @  L2))  \mwedge{}  (\mneg{}\muparrow{}null(L2))  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}b\mmember{}L2.\muparrow{}r[b;last(L)]))
            \mwedge{}  \mneg{}\muparrow{}r[last(L1);last(L)]  supposing  \mneg{}\muparrow{}null(L1)))  supposing 
              ((\mneg{}\muparrow{}null(L))  and 
              (\mforall{}a:A.  (\muparrow{}r[a;a])))



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-10_54_33
Last ObjectModification: 2018_09_27-AM-10_47_46

Theory : list!


Home Index