Nuprl Lemma : Game-minus_functionality

G1,G2:Game.  (G1 ≡ G2  -(G1) ≡ -(G2))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  eq-Game: G ≡ H Game-minus: -(G) Game: Game all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] member: t ∈ T prop: implies:  Q so_apply: x[s] all: x:A. B[x] eq-Game: G ≡ H and: P ∧ Q cand: c∧ B Game-minus: -(G) left-indices: left-indices(g) right-indices: right-indices(g) mkGame: {mkGame(f[a] with a:L g[b] with b:R} Wsup: Wsup(a;b) pi1: fst(t) pi2: snd(t) guard: {T} exists: x:A. B[x] subtype_rel: A ⊆B top: Top right-option: right-option{i:l}(g;m) left-option: left-option{i:l}(g;m) or: P ∨ Q
Lemmas referenced :  Game-induction all_wf Game_wf eq-Game_wf Game-minus_wf left-indices_wf right-indices_wf or_wf left-option_wf right-option_wf subtype_rel_self left_move_minus_lemma right-move_wf equal_wf exists_wf left-move_wf right_move_minus_lemma eq-Game_inversion
Rules used in proof :  cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isectElimination thin sqequalRule lambdaEquality instantiate hypothesis cumulativity functionEquality hypothesisEquality independent_functionElimination lambdaFormation independent_pairFormation productElimination dependent_functionElimination dependent_pairFormation applyEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality inrFormation inlFormation because_Cache

Latex:
\mforall{}G1,G2:Game.    (G1  \mequiv{}  G2  {}\mRightarrow{}  -(G1)  \mequiv{}  -(G2))



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-PM-09_53_50
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_20-PM-10_41_20

Theory : Numbers!and!Games


Home Index