Nuprl Lemma : stream-lex_transitivity-proof2
∀T:Type. ∀R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ. (Trans(T;x,y.x R y) ⇒ AntiSym(T;x,y.x R y) ⇒ Trans(stream(T);s1,s2.s1 stream-lex(T;R) s2))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
stream-lex: stream-lex(T;R),
stream: stream(A),
anti_sym: AntiSym(T;x,y.R[x; y]),
trans: Trans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),
prop: ℙ,
infix_ap: x f y,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
prop: ℙ,
and: P ∧ Q,
infix_ap: x f y,
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
so_apply: x[s],
stream-lex: stream-lex(T;R),
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
rel-monotone: rel-monotone{i:l}(T;R.F[R]),
rel_implies: R1 => R2,
cand: A c∧ B,
guard: {T},
exists: ∃x:A. B[x],
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
trans: Trans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),
anti_sym: AntiSym(T;x,y.R[x; y])
Lemmas referenced :
implies-bigrel,
stream_wf,
s-hd_wf,
equal_wf,
s-tl_wf,
anti_sym_wf,
trans_wf,
all_wf,
exists_wf,
stream-lex_wf,
stream-lex-iff
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
lambdaFormation,
cut,
introduction,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
thin,
cumulativity,
hypothesisEquality,
hypothesis,
dependent_functionElimination,
sqequalRule,
lambdaEquality,
productEquality,
applyEquality,
functionExtensionality,
universeEquality,
functionEquality,
because_Cache,
independent_functionElimination,
productElimination,
independent_pairFormation,
promote_hyp,
equalitySymmetry,
hyp_replacement,
applyLambdaEquality,
equalityTransitivity,
dependent_pairFormation
Latex:
\mforall{}T:Type. \mforall{}R:T {}\mrightarrow{} T {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbP{}.
(Trans(T;x,y.x R y) {}\mRightarrow{} AntiSym(T;x,y.x R y) {}\mRightarrow{} Trans(stream(T);s1,s2.s1 stream-lex(T;R) s2))
Date html generated:
2017_04_14-AM-07_48_12
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-03_18_25
Theory : co-recursion
Home
Index