Nuprl Lemma : qmul_preserves_qle2
∀[a,b,c:ℚ]. ((c * a) ≤ (c * b)) supposing ((a ≤ b) and (0 ≤ c))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
qle: r ≤ s,
qmul: r * s,
rationals: ℚ,
uimplies: b supposing a,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
uiff: uiff(P;Q),
and: P ∧ Q,
uimplies: b supposing a,
or: P ∨ Q,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
prop: ℙ,
true: True,
qle: r ≤ s,
grp_leq: a ≤ b,
assert: ↑b,
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,
infix_ap: x f y,
grp_le: ≤b,
pi1: fst(t),
pi2: snd(t),
qadd_grp: <ℚ+>,
q_le: q_le(r;s),
callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,
evalall: evalall(t),
bor: p ∨bq,
qpositive: qpositive(r),
qsub: r - s,
qadd: r + s,
qmul: r * s,
btrue: tt,
lt_int: i <z j,
bfalse: ff,
qeq: qeq(r;s),
eq_int: (i =z j),
squash: ↓T,
guard: {T},
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :
qle-iff,
qmul_wf,
qle_wf,
int-subtype-rationals,
rationals_wf,
qle_witness,
qmul_preserves_qle,
squash_wf,
true_wf,
qmul_zero_qrng,
iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :
cut,
introduction,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
dependent_functionElimination,
thin,
natural_numberEquality,
hypothesis,
applyEquality,
because_Cache,
sqequalRule,
hypothesisEquality,
productElimination,
independent_isectElimination,
unionElimination,
isectElimination,
isect_memberFormation,
independent_functionElimination,
isect_memberEquality,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
hyp_replacement,
Error :applyLambdaEquality,
lambdaEquality,
imageElimination,
imageMemberEquality,
baseClosed,
universeEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[a,b,c:\mBbbQ{}]. ((c * a) \mleq{} (c * b)) supposing ((a \mleq{} b) and (0 \mleq{} c))
Date html generated:
2016_10_25-PM-00_07_42
Last ObjectModification:
2016_07_12-AM-07_50_32
Theory : rationals
Home
Index