Nuprl Lemma : bl-exists-append

∀[L1,L2,P:Top].  ((∃x∈L1 @ L2.P[x])_b ~ (∃x∈L1.P[x])_b ∨b(∃x∈L2.P[x])_b)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bl-exists: (∃x∈L.P[x])_b,  append: as @ bs,  bor: p ∨bq,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  bl-exists: (∃x∈L.P[x])_b,  top: Top,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  reduce: reduce(f;k;as),  list_ind: list_ind,  nat: ℕ,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  bor: p ∨bq,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  compose: f o g,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4],  strict4: strict4(F),  has-value: (a)↓,  squash: ↓T,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2]
Lemmas referenced :  reduce-append,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  top_wf,  fun_exp0_lemma,  strictness-apply,  bottom-sqle,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  fun_exp_unroll,  le_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  strictness-decide,  lifting-strict-callbyvalue,  has-value_wf_base,  base_wf,  is-exception_wf,  lifting-strict-ispair,  lifting-strict-spread,  lifting-strict-decide,  lifting-strict-isaxiom,  bor_assoc
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalRule,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalSqle,  fixpointLeast,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  axiomSqleEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  sqequalAxiom,  baseClosed,  callbyvalueDecide,  unionEquality,  sqleReflexivity,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  decideExceptionCases,  inrFormation,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination,  exceptionSqequal,  inlFormation,  sqleRule,  divergentSqle

Latex:
\mforall{}[L1,L2,P:Top].    ((\mexists{}x\mmember{}L1  @  L2.P[x])\_b  \msim{}  (\mexists{}x\mmember{}L1.P[x])\_b  \mvee{}\msubb{}(\mexists{}x\mmember{}L2.P[x])\_b)



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-08_03_43
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_34_13

Theory : list_1


Home Index