Nuprl Lemma : transitive-closure-minimal-uniform

∀[A:Type]. ∀[R,Q:A ⟶ A ⟶ ℙ].  (R => Q ⇒ UniformlyTrans(A;x,y.x Q y) ⇒ TC(R) => Q)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  transitive-closure: TC(R),  rel_implies: R1 => R2,  utrans: UniformlyTrans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  infix_ap: x f y,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  rel_implies: R1 => R2,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  utrans: UniformlyTrans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  transitive-closure: TC(R),  infix_ap: x f y,  member: t ∈ T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  and: P ∧ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  length: ||as||,  list_ind: list_ind,  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  false: False,  cons: [a / b],  rel_path: rel_path(A;L;x;y),  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  hd: hd(l),  spreadn: spread3,  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  colength: colength(L),  guard: {T},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  sq_type: SQType(T)
Lemmas referenced :  transitive-closure_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  utrans_wf,  rel_implies_wf,  istype-universe,  list-cases,  product_subtype_list,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  istype-void,  reduce_tl_cons_lemma,  subtype_rel-equal,  subtype_rel_wf,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  istype-less_than,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  list_accum_nil_lemma,  colength-cons-not-zero,  colength_wf_list,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-le,  list_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  subtype_base_sq,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  spread_cons_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  le_wf,  list_accum_cons_lemma,  rel_path_wf,  istype-nat,  equal_wf,  subtype_rel_function
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  rename,  Error :universeIsType,  cut,  applyEquality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  instantiate,  because_Cache,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  Error :functionIsType,  universeEquality,  setElimination,  productElimination,  productEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  imageElimination,  voidElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  independent_isectElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :productIsType,  Error :equalityIstype,  applyLambdaEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  hyp_replacement,  independent_functionElimination,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  approximateComputation,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  axiomEquality,  Error :functionIsTypeImplies,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  intEquality,  sqequalBase,  Error :isectIsType,  functionExtensionality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[R,Q:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  A  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].    (R  =>  Q  {}\mRightarrow{}  UniformlyTrans(A;x,y.x  Q  y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  TC(R)  =>  Q)



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_01_28
Last ObjectModification: 2018_12_07-AM-01_41_48

Theory : relations2


Home Index