Nuprl Lemma : qabs-difference-qmax

∀[a,b,c,d:ℚ].  (|qmax(a;b) - qmax(c;d)| ≤ qmax(|a - c|;|b - d|))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qabs: |r|,  qmax: qmax(x;y),  qle: r ≤ s,  qsub: r - s,  rationals: ℚ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  qmax: qmax(x;y),  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  true: True,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  guard: {T},  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  squash: ↓T,  qabs: |r|,  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  has-value: (a)↓,  has-valueall: has-valueall(a),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  qsub: r - s,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  evalall: evalall(t),  qpositive: qpositive(r),  lt_int: i <z j,  qmul: r * s,  decidable: Dec(P)
Lemmas referenced :  qle_wf,  rationals_wf,  q_le_wf,  bool_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  assert_wf,  qabs_wf,  qsub_wf,  qle_weakening_eq_qorder,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  qle_complement_qorder,  qle_weakening_lt_qorder,  uiff_transitivity2,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert-q_le-eq,  uiff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  equal_wf,  qle_antisymmetry,  valueall-type-has-valueall,  rationals-valueall-type,  evalall-reduce,  qpositive_wf,  qless_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  qless_complement_qorder,  assert-qpositive,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  qadd_preserves_qless,  qmul_wf,  qadd_wf,  qadd_preserves_qle,  qadd_comm_q,  qadd_ac_1_q,  qinverse_q,  mon_ident_q,  iff_weakening_equal,  qless_transitivity_2_qorder,  qless_irreflexivity,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  qless_transitivity,  qless_transitivity_1_qorder,  qle_transitivity_qorder,  qmul_over_plus_qrng,  qinv_inv_q,  mon_assoc_q,  qadd_inv_assoc_q,  zero-qle-qabs,  decidable__qle,  qmax_wf,  qle_witness,  qmax_lb,  qmax-symmetry,  qmax_strict_lb,  qabs-qminus,  qminus-qsub
Rules used in proof :  cut,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  baseClosed,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  productElimination,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  sqequalRule,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  callbyvalueReduce,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  impliesFunctionality,  minusEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  isect_memberFormation,  isect_memberEquality,  productEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a,b,c,d:\mBbbQ{}].    (|qmax(a;b)  -  qmax(c;d)|  \mleq{}  qmax(|a  -  c|;|b  -  d|))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-11_57_52
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_47_44

Theory : rationals


Home Index