Nuprl Lemma : fpf-ap_wf

[A:Type]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]. ∀[f:a:A fp-> B[a]]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)]. ∀[x:A].  f(x) ∈ B[x] supposing ↑x ∈ dom(f)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-ap: f(x) fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] deq: EqDecider(T) assert: b uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] member: t ∈ T function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fpf-ap: f(x) fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a pi2: snd(t) pi1: fst(t) prop: subtype_rel: A ⊆B so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] all: x:A. B[x] top: Top iff: ⇐⇒ Q and: P ∧ Q implies:  Q
Lemmas referenced :  assert_wf deq-member_wf pi1_wf_top list_wf subtype_rel_product l_member_wf top_wf deq_wf assert-deq-member
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalRule sqequalReflexivity sqequalTransitivity computationStep isect_memberFormation introduction cut applyEquality productElimination thin sqequalHypSubstitution hypothesisEquality hypothesis axiomEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry lemma_by_obid isectElimination lambdaEquality functionEquality setEquality setElimination rename because_Cache independent_isectElimination lambdaFormation isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality productEquality cumulativity universeEquality dependent_functionElimination independent_functionElimination dependent_set_memberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[f:a:A  fp->  B[a]].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)].  \mforall{}[x:A].
    f(x)  \mmember{}  B[x]  supposing  \muparrow{}x  \mmember{}  dom(f)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_17_49
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_16_44

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index