Nuprl Lemma : fpf-join-cap
∀[A:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)]. ∀[f,g:a:A fp-> Top]. ∀[x:A]. ∀[z:Top]. (f ⊕ g(x)?z ~ f(x)?g(x)?z)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
fpf-join: f ⊕ g,
fpf-cap: f(x)?z,
fpf: a:A fp-> B[a],
deq: EqDecider(T),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
top: Top,
universe: Type,
sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :
fpf-cap: f(x)?z,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
top: Top,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
and: P ∧ Q,
implies: P ⇒ Q,
or: P ∨ Q,
not: ¬A,
false: False,
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,
prop: ℙ,
guard: {T},
bool: 𝔹,
unit: Unit,
it: ⋅,
btrue: tt,
uiff: uiff(P;Q),
uimplies: b supposing a,
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,
bfalse: ff
Lemmas referenced :
fpf-join-ap-sq,
fpf-dom_wf,
fpf-join_wf,
top_wf,
bool_wf,
equal-wf-T-base,
assert_wf,
bnot_wf,
not_wf,
fpf-join-dom,
or_wf,
fpf_wf,
deq_wf,
eqtt_to_assert,
uiff_transitivity,
eqff_to_assert,
assert_of_bnot,
equal_wf
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
sqequalRule,
cut,
introduction,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
thin,
because_Cache,
hypothesisEquality,
isect_memberEquality,
voidElimination,
voidEquality,
hypothesis,
cumulativity,
lambdaEquality,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
baseClosed,
dependent_functionElimination,
productElimination,
independent_functionElimination,
unionElimination,
lambdaFormation,
promote_hyp,
inlFormation,
inrFormation,
universeEquality,
isect_memberFormation,
sqequalAxiom,
equalityElimination,
independent_isectElimination
Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type]. \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)]. \mforall{}[f,g:a:A fp-> Top]. \mforall{}[x:A]. \mforall{}[z:Top]. (f \moplus{} g(x)?z \msim{} f(x)?g(x)?z)
Date html generated:
2018_05_21-PM-09_21_58
Last ObjectModification:
2018_02_09-AM-10_18_33
Theory : finite!partial!functions
Home
Index