Nuprl Lemma : provision-equality

∀[T:𝕌']. ∀[ok1,ok2:ℙ]. ∀[v1:⋂:↓ok1. T]. ∀[v2:⋂:↓ok2. T].
  (provision(ok1; v1) = provision(ok2; v2) ∈ Provisional(T)) supposing (((↓ok1) ⇒ (v1 = v2 ∈ T)) and (↓ok1 ⇐⇒ ↓ok2))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  provision: provision(ok; v),  provisional-type: Provisional(T),  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  squash: ↓T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  isect: ⋂x:A. B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  provisional-type: Provisional(T),  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  provision: provision(ok; v),  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  cand: A c∧ B,  squash: ↓T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  quotient-member-eq,  squash_wf,  iff_wf,  pi1_wf,  equal_wf,  pi2_wf,  uimplies_subtype,  provisional-equiv,  isect_subtype_rel_trivial
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  instantiate,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  productEquality,  universeEquality,  sqequalRule,  isectEquality,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  lambdaEquality_alt,  inhabitedIsType,  functionEquality,  applyEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  universeIsType,  productIsType,  isectIsType,  dependent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairEquality_alt,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  rename,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation_alt,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  functionIsType,  equalityIstype,  axiomEquality,  isectIsTypeImplies

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:\mBbbU{}'].  \mforall{}[ok1,ok2:\mBbbP{}].  \mforall{}[v1:\mcap{}:\mdownarrow{}ok1.  T].  \mforall{}[v2:\mcap{}:\mdownarrow{}ok2.  T].
    (provision(ok1;  v1)  =  provision(ok2;  v2))  supposing  (((\mdownarrow{}ok1)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (v1  =  v2))  and  (\mdownarrow{}ok1  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  \mdownarrow{}ok2))



Date html generated: 2020_05_20-AM-08_00_47
Last ObjectModification: 2020_05_17-PM-06_52_38

Theory : monads


Home Index