Nuprl Lemma : series-sum-linear3

∀x:ℕ ⟶ ℝ. ∀a,c:ℝ.  (Σn.x[n] = a ⇒ Σn.x[n] * c = a * c)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  series-sum: Σn.x[n] = a,  rmul: a * b,  real: ℝ,  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :  series-sum: Σn.x[n] = a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  converges-to: lim n→∞.x[n] = y,  member: t ∈ T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  nat: ℕ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  sq_exists: ∃x:{A| B[x]},  rneq: x ≠ y,  or: P ∨ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  rleq: x ≤ y,  rnonneg: rnonneg(x),  rsub: x - y,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  rge: x ≥ y
Lemmas referenced :  integer-bound,  equal_wf,  set-value-type,  less_than_wf,  int-value-type,  subtype_base_sq,  nat_plus_wf,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  converges-to_wf,  rsum_wf,  nat_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  int_seg_wf,  real_wf,  mul_nat_plus,  le_wf,  all_wf,  rleq_wf,  rabs_wf,  rsub_wf,  rmul_wf,  rdiv_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rless-int,  nat_properties,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  rless_wf,  rmul_preserves_rleq2,  mul_bounds_1b,  zero-rleq-rabs,  less_than'_wf,  radd_wf,  rminus_wf,  rleq_functionality,  req_inversion,  rabs-rmul,  req_weakening,  rabs_functionality,  rmul-distrib2,  radd_functionality,  rsum_linearity3,  rmul_over_rminus,  rleq_functionality_wrt_implies,  rleq_weakening_equal,  rleq-int-fractions2,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  uiff_transitivity,  rmul-int-rdiv,  rmul_comm,  rleq-int-fractions
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  because_Cache,  cutEval,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  isectElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  hypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  lambdaEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  intEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  addEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  functionEquality,  inrFormation,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  isect_memberFormation,  multiplyEquality,  independent_pairEquality,  minusEquality,  axiomEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}x:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}.  \mforall{}a,c:\mBbbR{}.    (\mSigma{}n.x[n]  =  a  {}\mRightarrow{}  \mSigma{}n.x[n]  *  c  =  a  *  c)



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-09_18_01
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-07_43_19

Theory : reals


Home Index