Nuprl Lemma : series-sum-linear3
∀x:ℕ ⟶ ℝ. ∀a,c:ℝ.  (Σn.x[n] = a 
⇒ Σn.x[n] * c = a * c)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
series-sum: Σn.x[n] = a
, 
rmul: a * b
, 
real: ℝ
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
series-sum: Σn.x[n] = a
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
converges-to: lim n→∞.x[n] = y
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
nat_plus: ℕ+
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
guard: {T}
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
le: A ≤ B
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b)
, 
false: False
, 
not: ¬A
, 
sq_exists: ∃x:{A| B[x]}
, 
rneq: x ≠ y
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
iff: P 
⇐⇒ Q
, 
rev_implies: P 
⇐ Q
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
top: Top
, 
rleq: x ≤ y
, 
rnonneg: rnonneg(x)
, 
rsub: x - y
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
, 
rge: x ≥ y
Lemmas referenced : 
integer-bound, 
equal_wf, 
set-value-type, 
less_than_wf, 
int-value-type, 
subtype_base_sq, 
nat_plus_wf, 
set_subtype_base, 
int_subtype_base, 
converges-to_wf, 
rsum_wf, 
nat_wf, 
int_seg_subtype_nat, 
false_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
real_wf, 
mul_nat_plus, 
le_wf, 
all_wf, 
rleq_wf, 
rabs_wf, 
rsub_wf, 
rmul_wf, 
rdiv_wf, 
int-to-real_wf, 
rless-int, 
nat_properties, 
nat_plus_properties, 
decidable__lt, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
rless_wf, 
rmul_preserves_rleq2, 
mul_bounds_1b, 
zero-rleq-rabs, 
less_than'_wf, 
radd_wf, 
rminus_wf, 
rleq_functionality, 
req_inversion, 
rabs-rmul, 
req_weakening, 
rabs_functionality, 
rmul-distrib2, 
radd_functionality, 
rsum_linearity3, 
rmul_over_rminus, 
rleq_functionality_wrt_implies, 
rleq_weakening_equal, 
rleq-int-fractions2, 
decidable__le, 
intformle_wf, 
itermMultiply_wf, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_mul_lemma, 
uiff_transitivity, 
rmul-int-rdiv, 
rmul_comm, 
rleq-int-fractions
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalRule, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
lambdaFormation, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
cut, 
introduction, 
extract_by_obid, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesisEquality, 
productElimination, 
because_Cache, 
cutEval, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
isectElimination, 
equalityTransitivity, 
hypothesis, 
equalitySymmetry, 
lambdaEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
intEquality, 
natural_numberEquality, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
promote_hyp, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
independent_functionElimination, 
applyEquality, 
functionExtensionality, 
addEquality, 
independent_pairFormation, 
functionEquality, 
inrFormation, 
unionElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
int_eqEquality, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
computeAll, 
isect_memberFormation, 
multiplyEquality, 
independent_pairEquality, 
minusEquality, 
axiomEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}x:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}.  \mforall{}a,c:\mBbbR{}.    (\mSigma{}n.x[n]  =  a  {}\mRightarrow{}  \mSigma{}n.x[n]  *  c  =  a  *  c)
Date html generated:
2017_10_03-AM-09_18_01
Last ObjectModification:
2017_07_28-AM-07_43_19
Theory : reals
Home
Index