Nuprl Lemma : intlex-transitive

∀[l1,l2,l3:ℤ List].  (l1 ≤_lex l3 = tt) supposing (l2 ≤_lex l3 = tt and l1 ≤_lex l2 = tt)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  intlex: l1 ≤_lex l2,  list: T List,  btrue: tt,  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  intlex: l1 ≤_lex l2,  has-value: (a)↓,  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  guard: {T},  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  bor: p ∨bq,  band: p ∧b q,  le: A ≤ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  true: True,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  squash: ↓T,  cand: A c∧ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  subtract: n - m,  ge: i ≥ j 
Lemmas referenced :  value-type-has-value,  nat_wf,  set-value-type,  le_wf,  int-value-type,  length_wf_nat,  equal-wf-base,  bool_wf,  list_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  list_wf,  lt_int_wf,  length_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  testxxx_lemma,  le_weakening2,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  less_than_wf,  eq_int_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  le_weakening,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  decidable__lt,  iff_imp_equal_bool,  less_than_transitivity1,  true_wf,  assert_wf,  iff_wf,  squash_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  decidable__equal_int,  false_wf,  not-equal-2,  not-lt-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-associates,  add-commutes,  le-add-cancel,  add-swap,  intlex-aux_wf,  and_wf,  eq_int_eq_true,  band_wf,  less_than_transitivity2,  set_subtype_base,  non_neg_length,  subtract_wf,  minus-one-mul,  add-mul-special,  two-mul,  mul-distributes-right,  zero-mul,  add-zero,  one-mul,  nat_properties,  intlex-aux-transitive,  bor_wf,  btrue_wf,  or_wf,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bor,  assert_of_band
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  callbyvalueReduce,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  independent_isectElimination,  intEquality,  lambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  addLevel,  impliesFunctionality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  addEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  equalityUniverse,  levelHypothesis,  sqequalIntensionalEquality,  multiplyEquality,  productEquality,  inrFormation,  orFunctionality

Latex:
\mforall{}[l1,l2,l3:\mBbbZ{}  List].    (l1  \mleq{}\_lex  l3  =  tt)  supposing  (l2  \mleq{}\_lex  l3  =  tt  and  l1  \mleq{}\_lex  l2  =  tt)



Date html generated: 2017_09_29-PM-05_49_33
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-01_37_46

Theory : list_0


Home Index