Nuprl Lemma : int_add_grp_wf2

<ℤ+> ∈ OGrp


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  int_add_grp: <ℤ+>,  ocgrp: OGrp,  member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  member: t ∈ T,  ocgrp: OGrp,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  ocmon: OCMon,  abmonoid: AbMon,  mon: Mon,  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  infix_ap: x f y,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  band: p ∧b q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  bfalse: ff,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  abgrp: AbGrp,  grp: Group{i},  int_add_grp: <ℤ+>,  grp_car: |g|,  pi1: fst(t),  grp_le: ≤b,  pi2: snd(t),  grp_eq: =b,  grp_op: *,  le: A ≤ B,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  monot: monot(T;x,y.R[x; y];f),  ulinorder: UniformLinorder(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  uorder: UniformOrder(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  urefl: UniformlyRefl(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  utrans: UniformlyTrans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  uanti_sym: UniformlyAntiSym(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  connex: Connex(T;x,y.R[x; y]),  cancel: Cancel(T;S;op),  inverse: Inverse(T;op;id;inv),  grp_inv: ~,  grp_id: e,  cand: A c∧ B
Lemmas referenced :  inverse_wf,  grp_car_wf,  grp_op_wf,  grp_id_wf,  grp_inv_wf,  ulinorder_wf,  assert_wf,  infix_ap_wf,  bool_wf,  grp_le_wf,  equal_wf,  grp_eq_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  cancel_wf,  uall_wf,  monot_wf,  int_add_grp_wf,  subtype_rel_sets,  mon_wf,  comm_wf,  set_wf,  ulinorder_functionality_wrt_iff,  le_int_wf,  le_wf,  assert_of_le_int,  less_than'_wf,  assert_witness,  monot_functionality,  iff_weakening_uiff,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  intformand_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  decidable__or,  intformor_wf,  int_formula_prop_or_lemma,  iff_imp_equal_bool,  eq_int_wf,  band_wf,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  assert_of_eq_int,  iff_transitivity,  assert_of_band,  iff_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  itermMinus_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  productEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  applyEquality,  instantiate,  setEquality,  cumulativity,  independent_pairFormation,  intEquality,  isect_memberFormation,  independent_pairEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  voidElimination,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  functionExtensionality,  addLevel,  impliesFunctionality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed

Latex:
<\mBbbZ{}+>  \mmember{}  OGrp



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_16_56
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_28-PM-02_02_34

Theory : groups_1


Home Index