Nuprl Lemma : rsum_functionality_wrt_rleq

∀[n,m:ℤ]. ∀[x,y:{n..m + 1-} ⟶ ℝ].  Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m} ≤ Σ{y[k] | n≤k≤m} supposing x[k] ≤ y[k] for k ∈ [n,m]


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  pointwise-rleq: x[k] ≤ y[k] for k ∈ [n,m],  rsum: Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m},  rleq: x ≤ y,  real: ℝ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  rsum: Σ{x[k] | n≤k≤m},  rleq: x ≤ y,  rnonneg: rnonneg(x),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  real: ℝ,  prop: ℙ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  has-value: (a)↓,  has-valueall: has-valueall(a),  cand: A c∧ B,  top: Top,  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  pointwise-rleq: x[k] ≤ y[k] for k ∈ [n,m],  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_properties,  select-from-upto,  assert_of_bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  iff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases,  not_wf,  bnot_wf,  assert_wf,  lt_int_wf,  select-map,  lelt_wf,  top_wf,  subtype_rel_list,  length-from-upto,  length-map,  length_wf,  nat_wf,  length_wf_nat,  map-length,  radd-list_functionality_wrt_rleq,  valueall-type-real-list,  evalall-reduce,  from-upto_wf,  less_than_wf,  le_wf,  and_wf,  map_wf,  real-valueall-type,  list-valueall-type,  list_wf,  valueall-type-has-valueall,  int-value-type,  value-type-has-value,  pointwise-rleq_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  real_wf,  int_seg_wf,  rsum_wf,  rsub_wf,  less_than'_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  because_Cache,  lemma_by_obid,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  minusEquality,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  isect_memberEquality,  functionEquality,  intEquality,  voidElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  setEquality,  callbyvalueReduce,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  productEquality,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  impliesFunctionality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll

Latex:
\mforall{}[n,m:\mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[x,y:\{n..m  +  1\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbR{}].
    \mSigma{}\{x[k]  |  n\mleq{}k\mleq{}m\}  \mleq{}  \mSigma{}\{y[k]  |  n\mleq{}k\mleq{}m\}  supposing  x[k]  \mleq{}  y[k]  for  k  \mmember{}  [n,m]



Date html generated: 2016_05_18-AM-07_45_11
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_17-AM-02_07_50

Theory : reals


Home Index