Nuprl Lemma : fan-bar-not-unbounded

∀[T:Type]. ∀A:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ T) ⟶ 𝔹. (bar(A) ⇒ (¬(Tree(¬(A)) ∧ Unbounded(¬(A))))) supposing ¬¬Fan(T)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  altneg: ¬(A),  alttree: Tree(A),  altunbounded: Unbounded(A),  altfan: Fan(T),  altbar: bar(X),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  true: True,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  subtract: n - m,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  altneg: ¬(A),  le: A ≤ B,  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  alttree: Tree(A),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  bfalse: ff,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  prop: ℙ,  top: Top,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  nat: ℕ,  altunbounded: Unbounded(A),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  altubar: uniformBar(X),  and: P ∧ Q,  altfan: Fan(T),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  true_wf,  squash_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  le-add-cancel,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  less-iff-le,  sq_stable__le,  add-associates,  add-commutes,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-swap,  minus-one-mul,  minus-add,  condition-implies-le,  not-le-2,  istype-false,  int_seg_subtype,  subtype_rel_function,  assert_of_bnot,  int_seg_properties,  istype-universe,  altfan_wf,  int_seg_wf,  istype-nat,  altbar_wf,  altunbounded_wf,  altneg_wf,  alttree_wf,  less_than_wf,  assert_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases_sqequal,  eqff_to_assert,  istype-less_than,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  intformless_wf,  decidable__lt,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  lt_int_wf,  istype-le,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-int,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__le,  nat_properties
Rules used in proof :  functionExtensionality,  hyp_replacement,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  minusEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  Error :isectIsTypeImplies,  Error :functionIsTypeImplies,  Error :functionIsType,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  Error :equalityIstype,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  Error :productIsType,  applyEquality,  equalityElimination,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  because_Cache,  Error :universeIsType,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalRule,  voidElimination,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  approximateComputation,  independent_isectElimination,  unionElimination,  isectElimination,  extract_by_obid,  natural_numberEquality,  rename,  setElimination,  addEquality,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  productElimination,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  promote_hyp,  independent_functionElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  thin,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}A:n:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  T)  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}.  (bar(A)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}(Tree(\mneg{}(A))  \mwedge{}  Unbounded(\mneg{}(A)))))  supposing  \mneg{}\mneg{}Fan(T)



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_46_38
Last ObjectModification: 2019_06_07-AM-11_14_59

Theory : fan-theorem


Home Index