Nuprl Lemma : Game-add_functionality

G1,H1,G2,H2:Game.  (G1 ≡ G2  H1 ≡ H2  G1 ⊕ H1 ≡ G2 ⊕ H2)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  eq-Game: G ≡ H Game-add: G ⊕ H Game: Game all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] member: t ∈ T prop: implies:  Q so_apply: x[s] all: x:A. B[x] eq-Game: G ≡ H and: P ∧ Q cand: c∧ B Game-add: G ⊕ H right-indices: right-indices(g) left-indices: left-indices(g) mkGame: {mkGame(f[a] with a:L g[b] with b:R} Wsup: Wsup(a;b) pi1: fst(t) pi2: snd(t) guard: {T} exists: x:A. B[x] subtype_rel: A ⊆B uimplies: supposing a top: Top right-option: right-option{i:l}(g;m) left-option: left-option{i:l}(g;m) or: P ∨ Q
Lemmas referenced :  Game-induction all_wf Game_wf eq-Game_wf Game-add_wf left-indices_wf right-indices_wf or_wf left-option_wf right-option_wf subtype_rel_union left_move_add_inl_lemma left-move_wf equal_wf exists_wf right-move_wf left_move_add_inr_lemma right_move_add_inl_lemma right_move_add_inr_lemma eq-Game_inversion
Rules used in proof :  cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isectElimination thin sqequalRule lambdaEquality instantiate hypothesis cumulativity functionEquality hypothesisEquality independent_functionElimination lambdaFormation independent_pairFormation unionElimination because_Cache productElimination dependent_functionElimination dependent_pairFormation inlEquality voidEquality applyEquality independent_isectElimination voidElimination isect_memberEquality inlFormation inrEquality inrFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}G1,H1,G2,H2:Game.    (G1  \mequiv{}  G2  {}\mRightarrow{}  H1  \mequiv{}  H2  {}\mRightarrow{}  G1  \moplus{}  H1  \mequiv{}  G2  \moplus{}  H2)



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-PM-09_53_46
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_20-PM-10_42_11

Theory : Numbers!and!Games


Home Index