Nuprl Lemma : l_disjoint-fpf-dom

[A:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)]. ∀[f:a:A fp-> Top]. ∀[L:A List].
  uiff(l_disjoint(A;fst(f);L);∀[a:A]. ¬(a ∈ L) supposing ↑a ∈ dom(f))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] l_disjoint: l_disjoint(T;l1;l2) l_member: (x ∈ l) list: List deq: EqDecider(T) assert: b uiff: uiff(P;Q) uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] top: Top pi1: fst(t) not: ¬A universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) l_disjoint: l_disjoint(T;l1;l2) fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uiff: uiff(P;Q) and: P ∧ Q uimplies: supposing a not: ¬A implies:  Q false: False prop: subtype_rel: A ⊆B so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] all: x:A. B[x] top: Top iff: ⇐⇒ Q cand: c∧ B rev_implies:  Q
Lemmas referenced :  l_member_wf assert_wf deq-member_wf pi1_wf_top list_wf subtype_rel_product top_wf all_wf not_wf and_wf uall_wf isect_wf deq_wf assert-deq-member
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalRule sqequalReflexivity sqequalTransitivity computationStep isect_memberFormation introduction cut independent_pairFormation lambdaFormation thin hypothesis sqequalHypSubstitution independent_functionElimination voidElimination lemma_by_obid isectElimination hypothesisEquality lambdaEquality dependent_functionElimination because_Cache applyEquality functionEquality setEquality independent_isectElimination isect_memberEquality voidEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry productElimination independent_pairEquality productEquality universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)].  \mforall{}[f:a:A  fp->  Top].  \mforall{}[L:A  List].
    uiff(l\_disjoint(A;fst(f);L);\mforall{}[a:A].  \mneg{}(a  \mmember{}  L)  supposing  \muparrow{}a  \mmember{}  dom(f))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_31_39
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_26_36

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index