Nuprl Lemma : int_ring_wf

ℤ-rng ∈ IntegDom{i}


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  int_ring: ℤ-rng,  integ_dom: IntegDom{i},  member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  member: t ∈ T,  integ_dom: IntegDom{i},  crng: CRng,  rng: Rng,  int_ring: ℤ-rng,  rng_sig: RngSig,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  exposed-bfalse: exposed-bfalse,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  ring_p: IsRing(T;plus;zero;neg;times;one),  bilinear: BiLinear(T;pl;tm),  monoid_p: IsMonoid(T;op;id),  group_p: IsGroup(T;op;id;inv),  ident: Ident(T;op;id),  assoc: Assoc(T;op),  inverse: Inverse(T;op;id;inv),  rng_car: |r|,  pi1: fst(t),  rng_plus: +r,  pi2: snd(t),  rng_zero: 0,  rng_minus: -r,  rng_times: *,  rng_one: 1,  infix_ap: x f y,  cand: A c∧ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  comm: Comm(T;op),  integ_dom_p: IsIntegDom(r),  true: True,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T}
Lemmas referenced :  eq_int_wf,  le_int_wf,  bool_wf,  uiff_transitivity,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  assert_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  it_wf,  iff_transitivity,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  unit_wf2,  equal_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  itermMinus_wf,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  ring_p_wf,  rng_car_wf,  rng_plus_wf,  rng_zero_wf,  rng_minus_wf,  rng_times_wf,  rng_one_wf,  comm_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  true_wf,  int_entire,  integ_dom_p_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  dependent_pairEquality,  intEquality,  lambdaEquality,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  minusEquality,  multiplyEquality,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  sqequalRule,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  inrEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  impliesFunctionality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  inlEquality,  divideEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  functionEquality,  unionEquality,  productEquality,  cumulativity,  isect_memberFormation,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  axiomEquality,  independent_pairEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  addLevel,  instantiate

Latex:
\mBbbZ{}-rng  \mmember{}  IntegDom\{i\}



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_18_36
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_28-PM-02_03_29

Theory : rings_1


Home Index