Nuprl Lemma : fpf-compatible-join

∀[A:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]. ∀[f,g,h:a:A fp-> B[a]].  (h || f ⊕ g) supposing (h || g and h || f)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-join: f ⊕ g,  fpf-compatible: f || g,  fpf: a:A fp-> B[a],  deq: EqDecider(T),  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  fpf-compatible: f || g,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  cand: A c∧ B,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  false: False
Lemmas referenced :  assert_wf,  fpf-dom_wf,  subtype-fpf2,  top_wf,  fpf-join_wf,  fpf-compatible_wf,  fpf_wf,  deq_wf,  bool_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  fpf-ap_wf,  fpf-join-ap,  iff_weakening_equal,  eqtt_to_assert,  uiff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  fpf-join-dom
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  lambdaFormation,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  axiomEquality,  hypothesis,  productEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  independent_isectElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  because_Cache,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  baseClosed,  productElimination,  imageElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[f,g,h:a:A  fp->  B[a]].
    (h  ||  f  \moplus{}  g)  supposing  (h  ||  g  and  h  ||  f)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_28_24
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_23_43

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index