Nuprl Lemma : cross-product-non-zero-implies-ext

∀r:IntegDom{i}
  ((∀x,y:|r|.  Dec(x = y ∈ |r|))
  ⇒ (∀a:{a:ℕ3 ⟶ |r|| ¬(a = 0 ∈ (ℕ3 ⟶ |r|))} . ∀b:{b:ℕ3 ⟶ |r|| 
                                                    (¬(b = 0 ∈ (ℕ3 ⟶ |r|))) ∧ (¬((a x b) = 0 ∈ (ℕ3 ⟶ |r|)))} .
        (∃l:{p:ℕ3 ⟶ |r|| ¬(p = 0 ∈ (ℕ3 ⟶ |r|))}  [(((a . l) = 0 ∈ |r|) ∧ (¬((b . l) = 0 ∈ |r|)))])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  scalar-product: (a . b),  cross-product: (a x b),  zero-vector: 0,  int_seg: {i..j-},  decidable: Dec(P),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T,  integ_dom: IntegDom{i},  rng_zero: 0,  rng_car: |r|
Definitions unfolded in proof :  member: t ∈ T,  bfalse: ff,  it: ⋅,  mk_deq: mk_deq(p),  isl: isl(x),  btrue: tt,  vector-mul: (c*a),  infix_ap: x f y,  eq_int: (i =z j),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  nonzero-cross-imp: nonzero-cross-imp(r;eq;a;b),  cross-product-non-zero-implies,  sq_stable__and,  sq_stable__not,  decidable__exists_int_seg,  decidable__cand,  decidable__not,  decidable__equal_compact_domain,  compact-finite,  any: any x,  decidable__and2,  decidable__implies,  decidable__false,  deq-exists,  decidable__equal_bool,  decidable__and,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: so_lambda4,  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  has-value: (a)↓
Lemmas referenced :  cross-product-non-zero-implies,  lifting-strict-decide,  istype-void,  strict4-decide,  lifting-strict-int_eq,  strict4-spread,  has-value_wf_base,  is-exception_wf,  sq_stable__and,  sq_stable__not,  decidable__exists_int_seg,  decidable__cand,  decidable__not,  decidable__equal_compact_domain,  compact-finite,  decidable__and2,  decidable__implies,  decidable__false,  deq-exists,  decidable__equal_bool,  decidable__and,  btrue_neq_bfalse
Rules used in proof :  introduction,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  cut,  instantiate,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  thin,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  isectElimination,  baseClosed,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  inhabitedIsType,  lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalSqle,  divergentSqle,  callbyvalueSpread,  productElimination,  sqleReflexivity,  equalityIstype,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  spreadExceptionCases,  axiomSqleEquality,  exceptionSqequal,  baseApply,  closedConclusion

Latex:
\mforall{}r:IntegDom\{i\}
    ((\mforall{}x,y:|r|.    Dec(x  =  y))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}a:\{a:\mBbbN{}3  {}\mrightarrow{}  |r||  \mneg{}(a  =  0)\}  .  \mforall{}b:\{b:\mBbbN{}3  {}\mrightarrow{}  |r||  (\mneg{}(b  =  0))  \mwedge{}  (\mneg{}((a  x  b)  =  0))\}  .
                (\mexists{}l:\{p:\mBbbN{}3  {}\mrightarrow{}  |r||  \mneg{}(p  =  0)\}    [(((a  .  l)  =  0)  \mwedge{}  (\mneg{}((b  .  l)  =  0)))])))



Date html generated: 2020_05_20-AM-09_03_58
Last ObjectModification: 2020_01_10-PM-02_17_37

Theory : matrices


Home Index