Nuprl Lemma : polyconst_wf
∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[k:ℤ]. (polyconst(n;k) ∈ polynom(n))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
polyconst: polyconst(n;k),
polynom: polynom(n),
nat: ℕ,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :
int_seg: {i..j-},
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
so_apply: x[s],
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
polyform: polyform(n),
less_than': less_than'(a;b),
squash: ↓T,
less_than: a < b,
polyform-lead-nonzero: polyform-lead-nonzero(n;p),
nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,
assert: ↑b,
bnot: ¬bb,
sq_type: SQType(T),
bfalse: ff,
uiff: uiff(P;Q),
it: ⋅,
unit: Unit,
bool: 𝔹,
guard: {T},
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
or: P ∨ Q,
decidable: Dec(P),
btrue: tt,
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,
subtract: n - m,
eq_int: (i =z j),
polynom: polynom(n),
polyconst: polyconst(n;k),
prop: ℙ,
and: P ∧ Q,
top: Top,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
not: ¬A,
exists: ∃x:A. B[x],
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),
uimplies: b supposing a,
ge: i ≥ j ,
false: False,
implies: P ⇒ Q,
nat: ℕ,
member: t ∈ T,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :
polyconst-val,
int_subtype_base,
list_subtype_base,
int_seg_wf,
upto_wf,
length_upto,
not_wf,
assert-poly-zero,
equal-wf-base,
list_wf,
all_wf,
nat_wf,
poly-zero_wf,
assert_wf,
reduce_hd_cons_lemma,
length_of_cons_lemma,
cons_wf,
polynom_subtype_polyform,
polyform_wf,
subtype_rel_list,
polyform-lead-nonzero_wf,
length_of_nil_lemma,
le_wf,
polynom_wf,
nil_wf,
neg_assert_of_eq_int,
assert-bnot,
bool_subtype_base,
subtype_base_sq,
bool_cases_sqequal,
equal_wf,
eqff_to_assert,
assert_of_eq_int,
eqtt_to_assert,
bool_wf,
eq_int_wf,
less_than_irreflexivity,
le_weakening,
less_than_transitivity1,
int_term_value_subtract_lemma,
int_formula_prop_not_lemma,
itermSubtract_wf,
intformnot_wf,
subtract_wf,
decidable__le,
less_than_wf,
ge_wf,
int_formula_prop_wf,
int_formula_prop_less_lemma,
int_term_value_var_lemma,
int_term_value_constant_lemma,
int_formula_prop_le_lemma,
int_formula_prop_and_lemma,
intformless_wf,
itermVar_wf,
itermConstant_wf,
intformle_wf,
intformand_wf,
satisfiable-full-omega-tt,
nat_properties
Rules used in proof :
impliesFunctionality,
addLevel,
baseClosed,
closedConclusion,
baseApply,
setEquality,
imageElimination,
dependent_set_memberEquality,
instantiate,
promote_hyp,
productElimination,
equalityElimination,
because_Cache,
applyEquality,
unionElimination,
equalitySymmetry,
equalityTransitivity,
axiomEquality,
independent_functionElimination,
computeAll,
independent_pairFormation,
voidEquality,
voidElimination,
isect_memberEquality,
dependent_functionElimination,
intEquality,
int_eqEquality,
lambdaEquality,
dependent_pairFormation,
independent_isectElimination,
natural_numberEquality,
lambdaFormation,
intWeakElimination,
sqequalRule,
rename,
setElimination,
hypothesis,
hypothesisEquality,
thin,
isectElimination,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
extract_by_obid,
cut,
introduction,
isect_memberFormation,
sqequalReflexivity,
computationStep,
sqequalTransitivity,
sqequalSubstitution
Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}]. \mforall{}[k:\mBbbZ{}]. (polyconst(n;k) \mmember{} polynom(n))
Date html generated:
2017_04_20-AM-07_10_51
Last ObjectModification:
2017_04_17-PM-02_13_18
Theory : list_1
Home
Index