Nuprl Lemma : dl-diamond-unwind-1

∀a:Prog. ∀phi:Prop.  |= <(a)*> phi ⇒ (phi ∨ <a> (phi ⇒ 0) ∨ <(a)*> phi)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  dl-valid: |= phi,  dl-diamond: <x1> x,  dl-or: x1 ∨ x,  dl-implies: x1 ⇒ x,  dl-false: 0,  dl-iterate: (x)*,  dl-prop: Prop,  dl-prog: Prog,  all: ∀x:A. B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  dl-valid: |= phi,  dl-prop-sem: [|phi|],  dl-sem: dl-sem(K;n.R[n];m.P[m]),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  member: t ∈ T,  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  dl-prog-sem: [|alpha|],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  rel_star: R^*,  infix_ap: x f y,  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  not: ¬A,  false: False,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  rel_exp: R^n,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  btrue: tt,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  cand: A c∧ B
Lemmas referenced :  dl-ind-dl-implies,  istype-void,  dl-ind-dl-diamond,  dl-ind-dl-iterate,  dl-ind-dl-or,  dl-ind-dl-false,  rel_star_wf,  dl-prog-sem_wf,  istype-nat,  subtype_rel_self,  dl-prop-sem_wf,  istype-universe,  dl-prop_wf,  dl-prog_wf,  rel_exp_wf,  istype-le,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  istype-less_than,  primrec-wf2,  false_wf,  rel_exp_add_iff,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  rel_exp1
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalRule,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  hypothesis,  productElimination,  productIsType,  because_Cache,  universeIsType,  applyEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  lambdaEquality_alt,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  functionIsType,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  rename,  setElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  unionIsType,  inhabitedIsType,  setIsType,  functionEquality,  unionEquality,  productEquality,  inlFormation_alt,  hyp_replacement,  equalitySymmetry,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  inrFormation_alt

Latex:
\mforall{}a:Prog.  \mforall{}phi:Prop.    |=  <(a)*>  phi  {}\mRightarrow{}  (phi  \mvee{}  <a>  (phi  {}\mRightarrow{}  0)  \mvee{}  <(a)*>  phi)



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_46_36
Last ObjectModification: 2019_04_25-PM-01_18_50

Theory : dynamic!logic


Home Index