Nuprl Lemma : cosh-inv-cosh

∀[x:{x:ℝ| r1 ≤ x} ]. (cosh(inv-cosh(x)) = x)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  inv-cosh: inv-cosh(x),  cosh: cosh(x),  rleq: x ≤ y,  req: x = y,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  rleq: x ≤ y,  rnonneg: rnonneg(x),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  real: ℝ,  inv-cosh: inv-cosh(x),  cosh: cosh(x),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  squash: ↓T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  less_than: a < b,  true: True,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  rge: x ≥ y,  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2,  top: Top,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  rneq: x ≠ y,  or: P ∨ Q,  rdiv: (x/y)
Lemmas referenced :  sq_stable__req,  cosh_wf,  inv-cosh_wf,  rleq_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rmul_preserves_rleq2,  less_than'_wf,  rsub_wf,  rmul_wf,  real_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  rsqrt_nonneg,  ln_wf,  radd_wf,  rsqrt_wf,  req_wf,  rless_wf,  set_wf,  rlog_wf,  expr_wf,  rexp_wf,  rminus_wf,  equal_wf,  req_witness,  rleq-int,  false_wf,  rmul-identity1,  rleq_transitivity,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  rleq_weakening_equal,  radd-zero,  rless-int,  rleq_functionality_wrt_implies,  rleq_functionality,  req_weakening,  rsub_functionality_wrt_rleq,  real_polynomial_null,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  radd_functionality_wrt_rleq,  rless_functionality_wrt_implies,  int-rdiv_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  equal-wf-base,  true_wf,  nequal_wf,  rdiv_wf,  rmul_preserves_req,  rinv_wf2,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  rmul_comm,  req_functionality,  int-rdiv-req,  req_transitivity,  radd_functionality,  rmul-rinv3,  real_term_value_mul_lemma,  real_term_value_add_lemma,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  rexp-positive,  req_inversion,  rless_transitivity1,  rleq_weakening,  uiff_transitivity,  rexp_functionality,  rexp-rlog,  rexp-rminus,  rdiv_functionality,  radd_comm,  rmul-rinv,  rmul_functionality,  radd-preserves-req,  itermMinus_wf,  real_term_value_minus_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  voidElimination,  applyEquality,  minusEquality,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  setEquality,  productEquality,  lambdaFormation,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  approximateComputation,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  addLevel,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  inrFormation,  int_eqEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[x:\{x:\mBbbR{}|  r1  \mleq{}  x\}  ].  (cosh(inv-cosh(x))  =  x)



Date html generated: 2017_10_04-PM-10_46_24
Last ObjectModification: 2017_06_21-PM-00_38_23

Theory : reals_2


Home Index